Laserfiche WebLink
Exhibit Page 27-E <br />changes further downstream (such as on the Robinson and Akin properties and beyond) regardless of the Line <br />Camp Pit presence. <br />The proposed elevation of the ponds (7213.5, 7215.5, and 7218.5) is below the base Flood elevation (at about 7217 <br />on the south end and 7225 on the north end, for the 100-year floodplain), and since land was excavated above the <br />proposed elevation of the ponds, the total storage capacity of the floodplain at this point is increased. The ponds are <br />not created by dams, but rather by excavation into the alluvial soil and deposits, and are separated by approximately <br />250 feet from the Dolores River. Most of the berths will be removed as part of reclamation, reducing barriers to <br />floodwater flow upstream even more, and thus reducing potential negative impacts both upstream and downstream. <br />11. Dreinage pipeline information <br />The drainage pipeline designed to carry return flows from irrigation near the southeast comer of the pit to the river <br />near the southern edge of the Truelsen property is being installed as a prerequisite of the landowner, prior to <br />beginning mining activities, and will also be used to allow dewatering of the pit as well as control of water levels and <br />discharge from the ponds following recamation, and so is listed as a permanent structure. <br />Fi ure G-3. Catch basin Fi ure G-4. Oulfall <br /> ~O o " <br />rwxL a cmcx D 1 Do <br />0~ <br />r <br />ttx~sn[D GWDL D ,D 000 <br />O <br />~. ~xw, LI <br />~ a <br /> <br />r <br />~ac 000 <br />~0 D e <br />,o <br />o- <br />~~DO,L wa o e I <br />- I <br />M p°~D ° ~w <br />O <br /> <br />NOD"DLD CMrMxL[ p <br />D <br /> RrP ,g[ <br />4Lxx' 4 • rpiP ryp{ <br />• -D' souwc sroxx DD.xx qxC <br />~e ,cJ <br />' r ,D <br />o o D <br />.e <br />oc <br />` <br />~ <br />°u <br />io " ~ <br />a <br />o <br />.moo <br />n <br />~ <br />cv <br />r a <br />~ ° <br /> O <br />o O pp QDOp <br />"sroD <br />. <br />`~" <br />" <br />°O <br />c <br />' 80 8 <br />~ <br />° <br />""-"~ <br />" <br />.rt <br />or ss°iie <br />'~iu <br />n <br />~oxnx~D~n u~oui <br />wi:~oac:o D °D <br />°DOO <br />o <br /> DISCHARGE AREA EROSION CONTROL DEiAiL <br />+is <br />Return flows al Id stone water enter the concrete catch basin Pipe slope is carefully calculated on all storm sewers and other <br />through the fra ne and cover (grate) at the top and then flow drainage pipes, to ensure that water velocity does not exceed <br />out the pipe, a; shown in this USACE "Not to scale" detail. acceptable limits. When excessive water velocity or soil is <br />Other catch ba rins (which also serve as access for very susceptible to erosion, various techniques are used to <br />maintenance) ~ ire located periodically along a storm sewer, provide for outfall "armoring" including the use of chutes, <br />which can also accept surface water flows, especially from low riprap, geomembranes (landscaping blankets), and energy <br />spots that woul i otherwise hold water and damage crops. dissipaters, as shown in this USACE "Not to scale" detail. <br />The pipeline i ~ constructed of 24-inch diameter PVC pipe, with a run of approximately 670 feet. Surface water is <br />conveyed int< the pipe via a catch basin, from a surface elevation (prior to mining) of 7216, dropping to a pipe invert <br />elevation of 7 207.65. The pipe discharges in an outfall with an invert elevation of 7204.15, for a total drop of 3.50 <br />feet in 670 fey ~t, or 0.52% (0.0052 ff/ft) slope. Using gravity flow (not foroed flow), this pipe is capable of carrying 22 <br />cfs, which is s pproximately 10% more than the estimated 20.4 cfs for worst case pumping. In this worst case <br />(highest flow) situation, the water would flow at a velocity of 7 fps, which is less than the 6 fps upper limit for <br />Four States Aggregates, LLC 15 MAR 2001 <br />Application for Permit: Line Camp Pit M-2001-001 FSA-LCP-D2-001 <br />