Laserfiche WebLink
No Canada lynx occurrence has been formally documented within or neaz the proposed <br />project area. There is always the possibility that lynx could move through the project <br />area, but the lack of suitable habitat probably precludes this from happening. Foraging <br />habitat is comprised of eazly successional forest stands with high densities of shrubs and <br />seedlings for prey species such as snowshoe hare. These conditions aze lacking in the <br />Douglas -fir stand neaz the project site. <br />The USFS has mapped riparian habitat along Minnesota Creek as suitable winter foraging <br />habitat. This small azea downstream of the confluence with Deer Creek will not be <br />disturbed by activities associated with Vent Shaft Construction. The Minnesota Creek <br />Road already receives a high amount of yeaz around use and will not be upgraded for this <br />project <br />The proposed project will not affect any lynx denning habitat. It will not affect any <br />suitable reproductive habitat. It will not affect summer and winter foraging habitat, or <br />migration habitat. Project activities will not affect individual lynx, in the short-term, <br />during project implementation by construction noise and elevated human presence <br />causing lynx to avoid using the project area as reproductive, foraging, or <br />migration dispersal habitat. Long-term and cumulative effects on Canada lynx are not <br />expected based on the knowledge that: <br />• The occurrence of Canada lynx within the project area is unknown, since official <br />surveys for this species were not conducted within the project azea. <br />• Suitable reproductive habitat for Canada lynx does not exist within the project <br />azea. <br />• Suitable foraging and migration/dispersal habitat for lynx does not exist within <br />the project area. <br />• The proposed project will not affect any lynx den/reproductive sites. <br />• Proposed project activities do not include vegetation alteration (logging) <br />strategies that would impact lynx. <br />• Proposed project activities do not include increases in road density or amounts, <br />since no new permanent roads will be constructed as part of project activities. <br />Any temporary roads that are constructed will be obliterated after use. <br />• Cumulative adverse effects on Canada lynx by proposed actions will not occur. <br />• The limited scope and scale of the proposed action means that lynx reproductive, <br />foraging and migration/dispersal habitat is not at risk. Lynx population viability <br />is not at risk. <br />Based on current information, the project will have No Effect on Canada lynx. <br />Bald eagle: No occurrence of bald eagle has been formally documented within the <br />proposed project azea. The neazest known bald eagle activity is along the North Fork of <br />the Gunnison River. Suitable nesting and reproductive habitat for bald eagle is found <br />along the river, but is not present in the proposed project azea. Bald eagles do winter <br />along the North Fork of the Gunnison River and in the winter possibly make foraging <br />