Laserfiche WebLink
DEC-19-2006 10:59R FROM:~ED RSSOCIRTES 970-416-0601 T0: 13038328106 P.4 <br />County's Master Plan requirements. The requirements in question are those intended to <br />protect designated scenic corridors, such as the stretch of US 287 adjacent to the site. <br />The question thus became one of how to know, with a reasonable level of certainty that <br />the reservoir project will move forward to completion. For the Planning Commission <br />hearing, staff crafted language that if the reservoir is approved (ROD and 404 pernrit), <br />funded, and scheduled for construction, this would be sufficient evidence that the <br />reservoir will be built. The applicant suggested that a record of decision in favor of the <br />reservoir, combined with the issuance of a 404 permit, would constitute an approval. To <br />that end, the applicant expects a positive record of decision in early 2007, and the 404 <br />permit should be issued by the middle of 2007 for the reservoir. <br />It was decided that staff and the applicant would again meet before the Board of County <br />Commissioners hearing to further discuss the finer details of what would trigger mining <br />operations. This meeting did occur on August 23, 2006. At the meeting, the applicant <br />stressed that 14 to 17 different governmental entities were (or could be) involved with the <br />reservoir, at a cost of an estimated $354 million dollars. Based on this information and <br />the level of financial interest involved, it was agreed that a positive Record of Decision <br />(ROD) and the issuance of a 404 permit could prove sufficient, if the Northern Colorado <br />Water Conservancy District also provided a letter to the County supporting the request. <br />The Water District owns both the land where the quarry will be located and the reservoir <br />site as well. The Water Conservancy District supports the request and indicates that the <br />construction contract may not allow the operation of a quarry while a dam is being built. <br />The Water District also indicated that because of the amount of time and investment <br />involved, once the permits are issued, the reservoir project should be considered viable <br />and expected to move forwazd. Based on the potential for limits to the quarry once the <br />dam is under construction, and the representations in the letter from the Northern <br />Colorado Water Conservancy District, Staff supports the request to accept the positive <br />ROD and issuance of a 404 permit as sufficient indicators that the reservoir will be <br />approved and built. Once the ROD and 404 permit aze in place, staff asked that the <br />Water District provide a follow up letter to outline the status of the reservoir project and <br />reinforce the information provided in the first letter. This has been added as a condition <br />of approval below. <br />The Development Services Team and Planning Commission recommend approval of the <br />proposed Glade Quarry Special Review with the conditions of approval as follows: <br />The Planning Commission recommends that the Glade Quarry Special Review, File #OS- <br />ZI547, appeal to Section 8.2.8 (Wetland Development Standards) to reduce the 100 foot <br />buffer requirement for wetlands down to 25 feet, be approved. <br />The Planning Commission recommends that the Glade Quarry Special Review, File #OS- <br />ZI547, appeal to Section 8.6.3.C.1. (Construction Standards, Pavement) to be able to use <br />recycled asphalt as a parking lot surfacing material, be approved. <br />