My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE125553
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE125553
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:22:56 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 2:07:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1999034
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
4/23/1999
Doc Name
MINING SETBACKS FOR THE PROTECTION OF STRUCTURES CAMAS COLO INC COOLEY RESERVOIR AND FULTON WILDLIFE
From
DMG
To
TOM SCHREINER
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Strain increases in pi <br />'Strains stiawn are tensile. <br />before excavation` <br />line. Following these findings, West <br />Gas deaded to implement mitigating <br />measures immediately. <br />Before implementation of these <br />measures, the area of the landslide <br />was surveyed so that the landslide <br />extent could be accurately defined <br />and the course of the landslide plane <br />interpreted. Following this survey, the <br />pipe alignment across the landslide <br />and the surrounding area was sur- <br />veyed with the pipe locator. <br />This survey indicated clearly dis- <br />tinct displacement of the line by ap- <br />proximatefy 9 ft downhill in the direc- <br />tion of landslide movement, and two <br />distinct line Flexures at both bound- <br />aries of the landslide. It became evi- <br />dentthat considerable deformations of <br />the landslide occurred .n the spring of <br />1985 and very probably during earlier <br />years, causing such significant dis- <br />placement of the line. <br />Emergency relief. An emergency re- <br />iiei of strains and stresses in the pipe <br />was pedormed at the end of May <br />1981. Stress reiiei was accomplished <br />by a trench excavated uphill from the <br />line with a backhoe. To reduce the <br />risk of line failure during the excava- <br />tion, the pressure in the line was <br />decreased from 420 psi to 50 pv. The <br />excavation was performed, starting in <br />the central part of the landslide, in <br />approximately 2 days. An immediate <br />effect of strain relief was evident when <br />the line displaced verv rapidly uphill <br />trOm iI5 Orlgindl location. <br />This displacement reached a maxr <br />mum of nearly } ft. Fit. i shows the <br />distinct flexure of the line at the <br />r.; a <br /> <br />is shown on Fig. }. <br />Strain Gauge I showed the lowest <br />stress reiiei of 1,430 µ-,trains. ~.vhile <br />Gauges ?and 1 showed considerably <br />high strain relief of 2,110 and 1,314 <br />µ-;trains. r?spectivey. <br />With an assumption of an average <br />stram reiiei of I,i21 µ-strains, total <br />stress relief can be calculated. <br />Total reiiei or the decrease of longi- <br />tudinal stresses in the pipe by the <br />excavation reached nearly 5?.000 psi. <br />,Maximum decrease of stresses is even <br />higher; it may have attained values <br />higher than 60,000 psi. <br />Longitudinal strain decreases moni- <br />tored during the excavation provide <br />information on stresses in the line <br />induced by landslide deformations. <br />It is evident that landslide deforma- <br />tions, between the time of line instal- <br />lation and that of excavation, induced <br />longitudinal stresses in the line on the <br />ordec of 12,000 psi. This is considera- <br />bly more than the yield strength of the <br />pipe (42,000 psi). <br />Stability analyses. With regard to <br />these findings, West Gas decided to <br />replace the line section across the <br />landslide. <br />Stability analyses of the landslide <br />area and analyses of possible remedial <br />measures indicated that fairly difficult <br />and costly methods of stabilization <br />would be necessary to secure the <br />long-term safety of <br />the line if it remains <br />buried. for this rea- <br />son, West Gas only <br />replaced the line <br />section across the <br />landslide and in- <br />stalled it above- <br />ground, on horizon- <br />tal support mem- <br />bers, to prevent line <br />failure in case of re- <br />peated, major land- <br />slide deformations. <br />It is expected that in <br />a case of major <br />landslide deforma- <br />tions, the line will <br />slide on the horizon- <br />tal support mem- <br />bers. The integrity of <br />the line would prob- <br />ably be endangered <br />in a case of large, <br />sudden, catastroph- <br />ic deformations of <br />the landslide. <br />Even ii such a <br />case cannot be ruled <br />out, its probability i5 <br />fairly low. <br />The original set of <br />Pipeline flexure <br />caused by landslide de- <br />formations IFIg. 5). <br />boundary of the landslide aher exca- <br />vation of the stress relief trench. <br />Strains in the line were continuously <br />monitored during the excavation. The <br />strain relief caused by the excavation <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.