Laserfiche WebLink
<br />West G.ts In invr_sugating the area and <br />In designing and implementaiing miti- <br />gating measures at individual critical <br />locanons. <br />. Strain gauges installed. Monitoring <br />methods using vibrating-wire strain <br />gauges have systematically been used <br />along the lateral. Such monitoring <br />methods are described elsewhere.' <br />They are based on installations of <br />strategically located vibrating-wire <br />strain gauges in sets of three at select- <br />ed locations where stability problems <br />are suspected. <br />Continuous monitoring of strains in <br />the pipe provides reliable information <br />on slope or landslide deformations <br />and enables the line operator to insti- <br />gate early mitigating measures to pre- <br />vent breakage of the line. <br />Because of the importance of the <br />line, West Gas has been systematical- <br />ly improving its safety. The improve- <br />ments have included stabilization of <br />some critical areas, relocation of cer- <br />tain sections of the line, and special <br />installations. Monitoring with vibrat- <br />ing-wire strain gauges has enabled the <br />line operator continuously to evaluate <br />the safety of the line. During 1986, <br />[he installed monitoring system pro- <br />vided West Gas with an early warning <br />of landslide deformations that would <br />be difficult to detett by any other <br />method. The experience gained in this <br />case, referred to as Landslide 7, is <br />presented here. <br />Landslide 7. During the geotechni- <br />cal studies performed in 1984.85, a <br />geologic feature was identified as a <br />landslide along the alignment in the <br />vicinity of historic Camp Hale, site of <br />the 10th Mountain Division. <br />The landslide did not indicate any <br />deformations during the time of the <br />geotechnical studies. The landslide is <br />shown on Figs. 1 and 2. <br />The landslide is approximately 600 <br />ft long and 220 to 380 Ft wide. Its toe <br />extends into the Eagle River. <br />As no deformations have been iden- <br />tified on the opposite side of the river, <br />it can be reasonably assumed that the <br />landslide slip plane outcrops at ap- <br />proximately the elevation of the river <br />bottom. It is probable that river ero- <br />sion contributed to the development <br />of the landslide and possibly to the <br />renewal of deformations at the present <br />time. The course of the landslide slip <br />plane has been interpreted based on <br />topographic features and ~vithoW any <br />exploratory drilling. The intepretation <br />is shown in Section A-A' on Fig. ?. <br />Based on the assumed course of the <br />slip plane, the total yardage of the <br />landslide was estimated to be approx~- <br />mately 200,000 cu yd. <br />The pipeline was installed across <br />the landslide in its slower third. In <br />order to monitor strains in the line. <br /> <br />Landslide 7 profile of A-A' <br />F;q , <br />a so ~a :oo <br />9,gD0 son n <br />= 9,7Da Gy` ~= <br />_ G O ..~ <br />O <br />W9.20 ~~ I ~ I 9n t <br />9,100 ~. Wngslide mass <br />2. Interpreted langsude :IiO Olane <br />7. Prapa[Ik laquon al pngmal nne mstallauttn <br />s. tine aispucea oy anaslvle <br />Record of strain readings <br />_, <br />Fiy. 7 <br />aw <br /> Q it <br />2W O Slain inpRiSK <br /> _ by unas~iae <br /> <br /> <br />zaa f <br /> ° ~ _ ~Sinin fieaeues <br /> - Iry eztlvappn <br />,~ _ <br />_ - ~ <br /> <br /> ~' <br /> a <br /> a <br />,~a <br /> <br />,600 Expavatipn an0 {pipe repl artment <br /> T~Strain s keep ~npeaSinq~ 0ld o me cut and ROIi <br />6 0 N D J F ~ M A M J J A S D N D J F M A <br />1965 <br />1986 <br />one set of vibrating-wire strain gauges <br />was installed in the central portion of <br />the landslide in 1985. <br />This set of gauges comprises one <br />part of a complex monitoring system <br />where strain gauges were installed on <br />the line at numerous other locations <br />Ihat are either landslides or areas with <br />potential slope stabiluy hazards. <br />Three strain gauges were installed <br />at this location. Strain Gauge 1 was <br />installed at the top of the line, and <br />Gauges 2 and 3 at 120° intervals. <br />Fig. 3 shows dram increases from <br />~nsiallation until the present. <br />A[tual strains in the pipe at the time <br />of installation were not known. Fur <br />Ihis reason, the basic reading at the <br />time of installation is assumed to rep- <br />resent 0 in the plat of the strains. <br />Steady increase. The strain plat be- <br />tween pauber 198.1 and Apnl 1986 <br />indicated a slow but steady increase <br />of strains. While the upper gauge <br />(Gauge 1) indicated the slowest in- <br />crease, both the lower gauges (2 and <br />3) indicated a more significant strain <br />increase. From April to May 1986, <br />strains began to increase rapidly, and <br />West Gas decided to inspect the area; <br />the site inspection revealed numerous <br />new tension cracks in the upper por- <br />tion of the landslide. <br />It was evident that old landslide <br />deformations had been rene•.ved and <br />the safety of the line endangered. The <br />longitudinal, relative straini m the line <br />prior to mitigation are Shown on Fig. <br />4. The line showed significant in- <br />creases in longitudinal tensile strains <br />at all three gauge locations. <br />Maximum and minimum [ensile <br />strains are within ?° of a vertical <br />plane. This indicates that a vertical <br />component of landslide deformations <br />has an important influence on the <br />