My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE125463
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE125463
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:22:51 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 1:56:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
EXHIBIT 26a(1) Refuse Pile, Rock Check Dam Design
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL MAJOR DRAINAGE <br />• be estimated for ordinary riprap using: <br />n = .0395 d50 176 <br />in which d50 = the mean stone size in feet. <br />This equation does not apply to grouted riprap (n = .023 to ,030), or <br />to very shallow flow (hydraulic radius is less than or equal to 2 <br />times the maximum rock size) where the roughness coefficient will be <br />greater than indicated by the formula, <br />5.4.2 Rock Size and Lining Dimensions <br />Table 5-5 summarizes riprap requirements for a stable channel <br />lining based on the following relationship which resulted from Smith <br />and Murray's model studies (24): <br />VS0,17 <br />= 4,5 (Equation 5-4) <br />d50 'S (Ss-1)•66 <br />• in which, V = mean channel velocity in feet per second <br />~ 5 = longitudinal channel slope in feet per foot <br />Ss = Specific gravity of rock (minimum Ss = 2.50) <br />d50 = rack size in feet for which 50 percent of the riprap <br />by weight is smaller. <br />The rock sizing requirements in Table 5-5 are based an the rock <br />having a specific gravity of 2.5 or mare. Rack having specific <br />gravity ]ess than 2.5 is considered unacceptable. <br />Table 5-5 represents a significant departure from past practices <br />by recognizing that rock size does not need to be increased for <br />steeper channel side slopes, provided the side slopes are no steeper <br />than 2h:ly (24). Rock lined side slopes steeper than 2h:ly are <br />considered unacceptable because of stability, safety, and maintenance <br />considerations. Proper bedding is required both along the side slopes <br />and the channel bottom fora stable lining. The riprap bianket thick- <br />ness should be at least 1.75 times d50 (at ]east 2.0 times d50 in <br />. sandy soils) and should extend up the side slopes at least one foot <br />above the design water surface. At the upstream and downstream termi- <br />nation of a riprap lining, the thickness should be increased 50 <br />percent for at least 3 feet to prevent under cutting. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.