Laserfiche WebLink
DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL MAJOR DRAINAGE <br />• fabric. Seepage parallel with the fabric might be reduced by folding <br />the edge of the fabric vertically downward about 2 feet (similar to a <br />cutoff wall) at 12-foot intervals along the installation, particularly <br />at the entrance and exit of the channel reach. Filter fabric has to <br />be lapped a minimum of 12 inches at roll edges with upstream fabric <br />being pi aced on top of downstream fabric at the lap. <br />Fine silt and clay has been found to clog the openings in filter <br />fabric. This prevents free drainage which increases failure potential <br />due to uplift. For this reason, a double granular filter is often a <br />more appropriate bedding for fine silt and clay channel beds. See <br />Figures 5-3 a through 5-3 c for details on acceptable use of filter <br />fabric as bedding. <br />5.4 Channel Linings <br />Channel linings constructed from ordinary riprap, grouted riprap, <br />or wire encased rock to control channel erosion have been found to be <br />• cost effective where channel reaches are relatively short (less than <br />1/4 mile). Situations for which riprap linings might be appropriate ~~ <br />are: 1) where major flows, such as the 100-year flood are found to ` <br />produce channel velocities in excess of allowable non-eroding values <br />(5 feet per second for sandy soil conditions and 7 feet per second in <br />erosion resistant soils); 2) where channel side slopes must be steeper <br />than 3:1; 3) for low flow channels, and 4) where rapid changes in <br />channel geometry occur such as channel bends and transitions. Design <br />criteria applicable to these situations are presented in this section. <br />Section 5.4 emphasizes design requirements associated with ordinary <br />riprap, while Section 5.5 contains additional design considerations <br />specifically related to wire enclosed rock. Both Sections 5.4 and <br />5.5 are valid only for subcritical flow conditions where *.he Froude <br />number is 0.8 or less. <br />5.4.1 Roughness Coefficient <br />• The Manning's roughness coefficient (n) for hydraulic computa- <br />tions has been found to be about 0.035 for wire enclosed rock and may <br />~4' <br />11 1G A7 <br />