Laserfiche WebLink
0~/20~99 13:19 FAE 3032731271 <br />• <br />Banks and Gesso, LLC <br />May 2o, t999 <br />Mr. Larry Oehler <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology <br />Departrnent Of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 2t3 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />n <br />LJ <br />720 IGpling SL,Suite117 <br />Lakewood, Colorado 80215 <br />(303)274-4277 <br />Fa: (303) 274-E329 <br />RE: Response to CDMG Second Adequacy Letter of May 10,1999 for the North River <br />Pit, File No. M-99-005 <br />Dear Laity: <br />We received your Second Adequacy Letter for the above-referenced application on May <br />13,1999 regarding inadequate responses to your original Adequacy Letter in addressing <br />the rules and regulations of the Mined Land Reclamation Board. I will answer your <br />concerns in the order they wen: presented: <br />General ReauiremerAs: <br />Q~ 1. The corrected maps (Exhibits C and F) are being submitted with this letter. <br />Q(L 2. (See 1 J <br />Exhibit C -Pre Minino and Mining Plan Mao of Affected Land: <br />Q ~ 2. All listed structures from the first Adequacy Letter that are within the delineated <br />permit area and wrttrin 200 R Of the permit area are shown and labeled on Exhibit C. <br />Ownership of the structures is either shown on Exhibit C or Figure C, which in effect, <br />is a part of Exhibit C. <br />() ~L, 3. Exhibit C has been revised to show that the depression contour within the South <br />Borrow Area is labeled as 'Area of Existing Excavation'. <br />NOTE: Please note the revised disturbed arfeage's for both the North Mining Area <br />and the South Borrow Area located on the map and in the Table of Exhibit <br />C. Table L, 'Reclamation Cost Estimate° under Exhibit L, has been revised <br />to include the change in reclamation costs based on the revised acreages. <br />This revised Table is attached. <br />Exhibit D -Minino Plan: <br />d(2 ~ 4. As stated in correspondence to you of May 10, 1999 regarding this application and <br />t FN ~tltrough further diswsaion with the applicant, there will be no asphalt plant proposed <br />Hai"~ (¢ fi ~ <br />s ~ Pi e <br />Bd,\`KS AND GESSO <br />~ 02 <br />