My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE122864
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE122864
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:20:46 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 10:53:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1999083
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
8/23/1999
Doc Name
ROTHER PIT FN M-99-083 ADEQUACY REVIEW OF 110 APPLICATION
From
DMG
To
JOHN DECHANT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />EXHIBIT F, Rule 6.3.6: The Exhibit F narrative supplied indicates only local approval, in addition to the <br />Division's, is being or will be sought. It is the Division's experience that many dry gravel pits also require <br />an Av Emissions Permit. Such possibility is not indicated in the Exhibit. There is also a possibility, <br />mentioned earlier, that the Office of the State Engineer may place some restrictions on the retention of <br />storm water on the site. <br />The County should submit a revised Exhibit F which includes commitments to contact the Av Pollution <br />Control Division and the Office of the State Engineer to determine the possible need for permits or <br />requirements or indicate to the Division why such contacts aze unnecessary. <br />EXHIBIT L, RULE 6.3.12: The Exhibit L narrative indicates that there are no permanent man-made <br />structures within 200 feet of the proposed penniUaffected area. There is, however, a fence indicated on the <br />Exhibit E Maps located north of the permidaffected area and within 200 feet of it. <br />The County should submit a revised Exhibit L in which the existence of this fence within 200 feet of the <br />penniUaffected area is acknowledged. The County should then satisfy the requirements of this Rule and <br />supply either the specified compensation agreement or an appropriate engineering evaluation that <br />demonstrates that such structure will not be damaged by the mining operation. <br />The decision date for this application is September 17,1999. Please respond to the above adequacy issues by <br />September 15,1999 in order that the Division has adequate time to evaluate your response and be able to <br />consider approval of the application on the decision date. All adequacy issues must be satisfactorily <br />addressed or a permit will not be issued. If you cannot respond completely to the adequacy issues identified <br />by September 15, 1999, please provide s written waiver of your right to a decision oo September 17, 1999 in <br />order to avoid s denial o[ the application and to allow the permitting process to continue. <br />If you have any questions on the above, please contact me. <br />4 <br />Sincerely, <br />Ja,rxo~C~,auou.o ~ ; <br />~.. <br />James C. Stevens i <br />Sr. Env'vonmental Protection Specialist <br />99NO84 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.