PERMFILE122864

• Permit No: M1999083
• IBM Index Class Name: Permit File
• Doc Date: 8/23/1999
• Doc Name: ROTHER PIT FN M-99-083 ADEQUACY REVIEW OF 110 APPLICATION
• From: DMG
• To: JOHN DECHANT
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

EXHIBIT D, Rule 6.3.4 (a): The Exhibit D narrative indicates where the overburden will be stockpiled but
not when it will be replaced in relation to ongoing extraction as the Rule requtres.
The County should submit a revised Exhibit D which responds to the requvements of this Rule.
EXHIBIT D, Rule 6.3.4 (c) (i): The Exhibit D narrative indicates that topsoil ranges in thickness from one
to twelve inches at the site but not the thickness of plant ¢rowth medium to be replaced.
If the County agrees and commits under Exhibit C to salvage 6 inches of topsoil and subsoil to serve as a
plant growth medium at the site, then for the sake of consistency, the County should submit a revised
Exhibit D to also indicate this.
EXHIBIT D, Rule 6.3.4 (e): The Exhibit D narrative indicates only that the access road, which the
Division accepts as not being proposed as part of the permit area, will remain after the mining is
concluded. As a result, the Division understands that the "loading area road" illustrated on the map
assigned as the Exhibit E-Mine Plan map will be reclaimed after the mining is concluded. The Exhibit D
narrative does not, however, indicate what the reclamation treatment will be of the catch pond and the
berm (which accompanies the loading area road) at the conclusion of the mining.
The Cotmty and submit a revised Exhibit D which indicates what reclamation treatrnent will be given the
catch pond and berm.
NOTE: THE DIVISION HAS ASSIGNED THE MAPS SUBMITTED AND mENTIFIED BY THE
COUNTY AS PART OF EXHIBIT C AND EXHIBIT D TO EXHIBIT E AS THE MINE PLAN AND
RECLAMATION PLAN MAPS, RESPECTIVELY. THE COUNTY MUST INDICATE ITS
AGREEMENT WITH THESE ASSIGNMENTS OR SUPPLY REPLACEMENT MAPS TO SERVE AS
THE EXHIBIT E MINE PLAN AND RECLAMATION PLAN MAPS. FOR THE MOMENT, THE
DIVISION WILL CONSIDER THE MAPS ORIGINALLY SUBMITTED BY THE COUNTY AS PART
OF EXHIBITS C AND D AS THE MINE PLAN AND RECLAMATION PLAN MAPS AND HAS
BASED THE FOLLOWING ADEQUACY COMMENTS ON THEM.
EXHIBIT E-MAP, Rule 6.3.5 (1): The map accepted as the Mine Plan Map (see NOTE above) indicates
the location of various elements of the mining operation. Some of these elements, however, i.e. part of the
loading area road and associated berm, are shown as lying partially outside of the proposed pertnit/affected
area boundaries. Both the road and the berm involve mining related disturbance. If this disturbance is
extended outside the permit/affected area boundaries, a violation of State Statutes will result.
The Counry should submit a revised Exhibit E-Mine Plan Map that indicates the loading area road and
berm will be constructed so as to lie within the perrnit/affected azea boundaries.
EXHIBIT E-MAP, Rule 6.3.5 (2) (b): The map accepted as the Mine Plan Map does not indicate the
names of owner(s) of record of the land within two hundred feet of the permit/affected azea (as it should)
or of the fence that also lies within two hundred feet of the petmiUaffected area.
The County should submit a revised Exhibit E-Mine Plan map that indicates the land and structure owners
as required by this Rule.
EXHIBIT E-MAP, Rule 6.3.5 (2) (c): The map accepted as the Mine Plan Map does not indicate the
location of the catch pond.
The County should submit a revised Exhibit E-Mine Plan Map that shows the location of the catch pond