My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE122701
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE122701
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:20:39 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 10:41:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
POSTMINING LAND USE
Section_Exhibit Name
APPENDIX O
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Gonzalez and Dodd (1919) conducted their study in Texas on the Rio Grande Plain. <br />They were able to more than double the total herbaceous production, and therefore <br />double available animal units for cattle and sheep, by removing brush from their <br />study areas. k'here sfrcubs provide essential habitat for wildlife however, their <br />• elimination or reduction ma}• increase [he carrying capacity for domestic livestock <br />but decrease i.t for the wildlife species. <br />Forme needs of bir, ,an=_ <br />There are five basic requirements for proper wildlife habitat. These requirements . <br />include water, forage, cover, landform or topography, and interspersion. Znter- <br />r;persion is defin•ui as Uie spatial arranoemeut of the other components, i.e. o•ater <br />fora~C, cover snd lardferm. (U.S. L`ept. of Interior Fish and [dildlife Service, <br />1973). <br />Numerous studies have been conducted to catalog ttie forage preferences of wild- <br />life and domestic species. A review of literature indicates that grazing prefer- <br />ences are more a function of what is available, green and palatable. (Pederson and <br />harper, 1978; Carpenter et al, 1979). During winter months,_shrubs are often heav- <br />ily grazed probably b=cause Chey are accessible above the snow and grasses and <br />forbs are una~•ailable. 4lhile shrub stands are, therefore, important on winter <br />• grazing lands, recent studies indicate grasses and fortis may be much more critical <br />on spring, sun¢aer, and fall grazing lands. Pederson and Harper (1978) conducted a <br />study on the LaSal Mountains of southeastern Utah to dete,.inine [he factors influ- <br />encing the productivity of two mule deer herds in Utalr. The abstract from Ch is <br />paper is presented in its entirety. <br />JORDAN C. PEDERSOId P.1:D K. T. HARPED. (1978) <br />Highlight: Doe-fawn counts show that the mule deer herd on <br />the LaSal Mountains of southeastern Utah produced over 38% <br />more farms per doe than [he Ilenry Ptountain t,erd over a 9-year <br />period. Carcass weights of animals from the LaSa1 herd were <br />generally greater for all a&c classes. Observed reproductive <br />differences appear to be unrelated to the incidence of diseases, <br />parasites, or predation. Furthermore, winter ranges are ncarty <br />equal in forap,e quantity and quality on fire two ranges. Summer <br />range vegetation on the LaSai Mountains, howevec, produced rare <br />forage of betCCr quality than did similar corm unity types on the <br />• -4- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.