My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE121928
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE121928
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:20:08 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 9:53:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2003001
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
9/11/2003
Doc Name
Board Order
From
MLRB
To
Hall-Irwin Corporation
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
14. The Applicant has made the necessary commitments to comply with the State <br />Engineer's rules governing injuries to water rights, in accordance with <br />Construction Materials Rule 3.1.6(1). <br />15. If its design does not function as anticipated, the Applicant and the Division <br />will discover the problem by virhze of the Applicant's groundwater <br />monitoring plan. The Applicant has proposed to use five wells to monitor <br />impacts on the aquifer. The Applicant plans to monitor groundwater the wells <br />before installing the slurry wall in order to establish baseline conditions. The <br />Applicant will identify pre-mine conditions as well as conditions throughout <br />all mining phases to detect any changes that might be caused by the slurry <br />wall or any other mining activity. The Applicant proposes to continue <br />monitoring groundwater levels after the wall is constructed in order to identify <br />any fluctuations that might be caused by the wall. <br />16. The Division testified that the groundwater table would not be elevated <br />enough by the proposed slurry wall to flood the surface thereby contaminating <br />the water with surface pollutants such as animal waste, pesticides, herbicides <br />or septic systems. Thus, the Applicant's plan minimizes impact to <br />groundwater quality, in accordance with Constmction Materials Rules <br />3.1.6(1). <br />17. The Objectors presented no evidence or arguments concerning impact on the <br />quality of groundwater in the area. <br />18. The Applicant has designed its proposed slurry wall to minimize effect on the <br />hydrologic balance in the area in question, as well as the quantity and quality <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.