Laserfiche WebLink
• TABLE 5 <br />DISCHARGES AND FIELD 9UALITY DATA <br />FOR <br />ENGLEVILLE GULCH <br />STATION MONTH FLOWS <br />cfs CONDUCTIVITY <br />u~hos/cm TEMPERATURE <br />Cent. _Q~_ <br /> A 25 C <br />EGW-SH APRIL .017 415 6.0 6.56 <br /> HAY <br />EGW APRIL .010 4l5 6.0 6.60 <br /> MAY # 130 4.0 7.11 <br />EGE APRIL NO FLOW <br /> MAY # 103 5.0 ~ 7.13 <br />EC APRIL .006 650 12.0 6.60 <br />• MAY # L22 4.5 7.08 <br />EG-KT APRIL .012 N. A. N. A N. A. <br /> HAY # 127 4.5 7.19 <br />* EGW-SM is further upstream of the EGW station which was sufficient <br />monitorln9 purposes, accordinglq, EGW-SM was dropped from the <br />monitoring program due to its redundancy. <br /># Flows in Nay could not be accurately deter~lned due to heavy dlschai, <br />that exceeded the width and capacity of the portable flue used for <br />the Apr11 flow ^easureeents. <br />N. A. Not deter~lned in April; the EG Station was downstream of Rl~rock's <br />original permit area. The EG-KT Station was upgraded to a full <br />monitorln9 station after the permit boundary was changed to Include <br />the EG station within the permit area. <br />4 <br />