My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE121480
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE121480
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:19:50 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 9:24:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2003091
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
1/16/2004
Doc Name
Adequacy Review #1
From
DMG
To
LaFarge West Inc
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
33. Rule 6.4.8(1)(d) requires the ApplicanUOperator to include a description of the general effect <br />during and after the proposed operation on the existing wildlife of the area, including but not <br />limited to temporary and permanent loss of food and habitat, interference with migratory <br />routes, and the general effect on the wildlife form increased human activity, including noise. <br />Please include the above requested information regarding the operation's effect on wildlife at <br />the site. <br />Rule 6.4.10 Exhibit J- Vegetation Information <br />34. In Exhibit J (page 24 of 45) of the application, Lafazge states that mining will impact 12 <br />cottonwood trees. However, in Exhibit E (page 11 of 45) Lafazge states that existing riparian <br />habitats will be undisturbed by the mining operation. Please explain this discrepancy. <br />Rule 6.4.12 Exhibit L- Reclamation Costs <br />35. The Division will estimate a cost to reclaim the site based on the information submitted by <br />Lafazge in the forthcoming adequacy response. <br />Rule 6.4.13 Exhibit M- Other Permits and Licenses <br />36. Lafarge did not state if a SSP, Well Permit or Plan of Augmentation will be obtained form <br />the Division of Water Resources, Office of the State Engineer. Please commit to obtaining <br />all necessary permits prior to the exposure of groundwater. <br />37. Lafarge did not state if an Army Corps of Engineers Permit will need to be obtained for <br />mining at the Duckworth Pit. Throughout the application, Lafazge states that non- <br />jurisdictional,jurisdictional and riparian areas are present on site. Please clarify this issue. <br />Rule 6.4.14 Exhibit N- Source of Legal Ri t to Enter <br />38. Please provide documentation for the Legal right to enter the easement associated with the <br />Smith and Emmons Ditch for purposes of mining and reclamation at the Duckworth Pit. <br />39. Please provide documentation for the legal right to enter the easement associated with the <br />conveyor structure proposed over Idaho Creek. <br />40. Please provide documentation for the legal right to enter the easement associated with the <br />conveyor structure proposed over Weld County Road 20%. <br />41. In Exhibit C of the Warranty Deed, it states that there are rights of way for ditches along the <br />North, East and West lot lines. Please explain these right-of--ways, and how Lafarge will <br />ensure that mining and reclamation of the Duckworth Pit will not infringe on these right-of- <br />ways. <br />Rule 6.4.19 Exhibit S-Permanent Man-Made Structures <br />42. Lafazge proposes to mine through the Sr:.ith & Emmons Ditch and maintain a 60-foot mining <br />offset distance from all permanent man made structures, including Idaho Creek. Please see <br />attached January 16, 2004 internal DMG memo titled, "Stability of Irrigation Ditches and <br />other Structures." Please address the Division's comments/concerns regazding Lafazge's <br />stability analysis in regard to imgation ditches and other structures. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.