My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE121301
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE121301
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:19:43 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 9:14:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2004067
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
6/30/2005
Doc Name
2nd adequacy review comments
From
dmg
To
banks and gesso llc
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
45. "Review of the proposed site indicates the mining operation will be directly affect both <br />the surface and ground water systems for the following reasons:" <br />• "The fractured aquifer yield is not poor as claimed by the applicant ..." <br />e "The fractured aquifer is not classilied as nontributary ..." <br />• "Well data in the vicinity of the proposed quarry site indicate that ground water will <br />be encountered with mining operations and that dewatering will be necessary. <br />Review of 300 wells within four miles of the site, shows the median depth to water is <br />120 feet ..." <br />• "Review of the well data also indicates that the water table is generally parallel to <br />the ground surface ...". <br />• "There is a risk that the quality and quantity of local ground water supplies will be <br />adversely affected :.." <br />• "There is also a concern that the proposed mining operation (blasting, etc.) may <br />- - introduce con ammanfs to the tn~erconnec~ed rf ages us pp yw~g be water to t~-e - <br />neartiy wells and negatively impact the water quality. Additionally, the proposed <br />blasting could plug the interconnected fractures and reduce or eliminate the yield <br />from these existing wells." <br />46. "All the information in the application is not correct. NLRB Rules state "all <br />information in an application must be accurate and complete."" "NLRB Rules <br />1.4.1(3)" <br />47. "The information required by NLRB Rules, including evidence that the operation will <br />comply with the applicable ground water performance standards under Rule 3, was <br />not provided by the applicant." <br />48. "The information required by the NLRB Rules because the operation is expected to <br />dnectly affect the ground water system (NII.RB Rules 6.4.7(2)), has not been provided <br />by the applicant." <br />49. "Cottonwood Creek is within the proposed site boundaries. The application incorrectly <br />states that "There are no perennial streams ... on the permit property." Exhibit G <br />does not comply with CMLR Act 34-32-116(7)" <br />50. "The applicant has not yet applied for or obtained a NPDES permit. NLRB Rules <br />require the applicant to either have the NPDES permit in hand or have applied to <br />CDPHE for the necessary NPDES permit at the time of its 112 permit application <br />submittal." <br />51. "Based on Exhibit C-2B, the access road will be constructed within 200 feet of a <br />BHCCSD's (Black Hawk & Central City Sanitation District) sanitary sewer line <br />serving the convenience store, yet the applicant has provided no documentation it has <br />complied with NLRB Rule 6.3.12." <br />52. " It is unclear if the ponds are designed and sized to adequately handle sediment <br />accumulations over the life of the mine. In addition, it is unclear if the ponds are <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.