My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE121301
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
300000
>
PERMFILE121301
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:19:43 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 9:14:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2004067
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
6/30/2005
Doc Name
2nd adequacy review comments
From
dmg
To
banks and gesso llc
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
30. "lack of adequate containment measures for above ground fuel storage" <br />31. " a jurisdictional wetland determination has not been completed for the site to <br />determine if any wetlands or waters of the U.S. are present" <br />32. "archeological & paleontological studies have not been conducted to determine the <br />presence and location of cultural and paleontological resources" (clearances have <br />not been obtained) <br />33. the re-vegetation plan includes significantly less shrubs and trees (20 per acre) than the <br />existing undisturbed vegetation at a density of 200 to 500+ per acre <br />-34.-the Proposed-grassland-and pr©pesed30-foot verdcalcliffs-provide-less valuable--- ---- .. _ _ <br />wildlife habitat than currently exits <br />35. the restoration plans for ephemeral streams and channels to be restored are inadequate <br />and need to include provisions for establishment of riparian trees and shrubs <br />36. erosion control methods are inadequate and should include hydro-mulching with <br />tackifier, and use a variety of erosion control blankets <br />37. hydro-seeding as a method for re-vegetation is not appropriate for this dry & steep site <br />38. the proposed planting medium may not be adequate for establishment of trees & <br />shrubs as described in the reclamation plan <br />39. "the reclamation cost estimate for re-vegetation is very low" <br />40. "the reclamation plan does not address noxious weed control" <br />41. the reclamation plan does not include a "re-vegetation monitoring plan" or "success <br />criteria to determine if wildlife habitat has been established" <br />42. the application does not provide sufficient information to "ensure that no injury occurs <br />to Black Hawk's water rights" <br />43. "The applicant's proposed plan to operate sedimentation control basins will cause <br />injury to Black Hawk's water rights.... the sedimentation basins will retain water in <br />the reclamation soils or consume the water by evapotranspiration to the injury of <br />Black Hawk's water rights." <br />44. "There have been quotes in the local press -attributed to Mr. Lembke (the applicant) - <br />regarding ultimate use of this site as a water storage unit. The suggested ultimate use <br />of the site for water storage would likely injure Black Hawk's water rights portfolio:' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.