Laserfiche WebLink
III IIIlllllllllllll <br />999 <br />November 18, 1977 <br />Cotter Corporation <br />P.O. Box 700 <br />Nucla, Colorado 81424 <br />RE: Adequacy Review. JD-9 nine. Our file 977-306. <br />Dear 1`.r. Hugus: <br />I have listed below several points in your recant permit application which <br />need clarification or additional infozmation prior to presentation before <br />the Soard. Thaee points do not include questions which may arise as a <br />result of tm7 initial inspection. <br />1) Application Pee: <br />a) The application fee eras incorrectly computed. The correct fee is <br />$185. The additional $11.25 should be fon~arded to this office. <br />2) Legal Description: <br />a) The principal meridian should be included in Uie lenal description. <br />3) Tiaps: <br />a) Ttte maps (Exhibit C) should clearly ahotr the affected area. <br />b) The vegetation map should show the approximate boundaries of the <br />different =egetation types in the area. <br />4) t41ne Plan: <br />a) Any water encountered in the mine that is reused for drilling will <br />require an ad~udicetion o! water rights. I have enclosed a copy of <br />the water resources memo far your infortoetion. <br />b) The mine plan should include the date that operations were initiated <br />and your anticipated termination date. <br />c) You are advised to be certain that you have allowed a sufficient <br />"buffer" none between the permit boundary and the limit of present <br />operations in order to avoid futnrs permit Doundsry problems. <br />