PERMFILE119647

• Permit No: M2004020
• IBM Index Class Name: Permit File
• Doc Date: 4/21/2004
• Doc Name: Preliminary Adequacy Review
• From: DMG
• To: RG Consulting Engineers Inc.
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

STATE OF COLORADO
DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY. ~ i~ ~~
Department of Natural Resources
1313 Sherman 6L, Room 215 ~ C 0 I, O IiA D 0
Denver, Colorado 80203 DIVISION O F
~ ~ MIN
A L $
Phone: [phone] &
FAX: [phone] ~ ~ G] ~ L ~ G Y
RECEAMATION•MIN ING
SAFETY•SCIENCE
April 21, 2004 ~~ cGlveOmor E
' Russell George
Mark Austin, P.E. Executive olrector
RG Consulting Engineers, Inc.' Ronald W. Cattany
336 Main Street, Suite 203 Division Direttor
Natural Resource~Trustee
Grand Junction, Colorado 81501
Re: Co% Grave/ Pit, 112c App/ication # M-2004-020, Pre/iminary Adequacy Review (PAR). '~
Dear Mr. Austin:
The Division of Minerals and Geology has beguri the review process for the above
referenced 112c application. The application was considered complete on April 16th,
2004. Therefore, the Decision Date is currently set for July 15th, 2004. Please insure that
any and all correspondence concerning the review process of this application is reflected in
the copy of the application located at the Mesa County Clerk's Office.
A Preliminary Adequacy Review (PAR) has been accomplished. Please clarify or correct
the following noted issues:
1- The Division requires that roads that are significantly upgraded for the purpose of
access to a mining site be included within the permit boundaries. Text within the
proposed Mining Plan denotes major upgrades to the haul road- and a bridge from
Kannah Creek to the site. Therefore, the applicant must file an amendment to the
application addressing the addition of the haul road into the proposed permit
boundaries. Please refer to Rule 1.8.1(1).(2) and (3) concerning the amendment to
a 1 12c application. All maps and text must reflect the amended permit boundaries.
Also, the 200-foot requirement for man-made structures and notices to adjacent
landowners is applicable.
2) Rule 6.4.3 (e) requires a description of the type of vegetation covering the affected
lands. The description on the map of "brushy areas" is too vague, Please describe
the vegetation community in better terms on the map.
3) The supplied maps do not have the reauired signature of the qualified person who
prepared them as required by Rule 6.2.112-Ib). Please supply one original and one
copy of corrected versions of the maps with signature and any other issues noted in
the application review process.
Office of Office of . Colorado