My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE118814
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
200000
>
PERMFILE118814
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:14:31 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 5:57:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981033
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 25 Bear 1 & 2 Reclamation Plan
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Species Identification: <br />In 1991 and 1992, voucher specimens were collected and confirmed or <br />identified by Dr. William A. Weber, retired Curator of the University of Colorado <br />herbarium as part of those studies. Most species that were identified during the 1993 <br />study were the same as those collected in 1991 and 1992; those that were different were <br />easily identified. Nomenclature follows Dr. Weber's book Colorado Flora: Western <br />Slone, 1987, Colorado Associated University Press, Boulder, Co. <br />Statistical Evaluation: <br />The calculation of sample adequacy followed methods outlined on page IS of <br />the Division's Vegetation Guidelines except that the t-value used in the calculation of <br />Nmin was not 1.64 as recommended but rather was drawn from the double-tailed t <br />table at the 9030 confidence level for n-] degrees of freedom. Calculations used as part <br />• of the post-mining demonstration of revegetation success are consistent with methods <br />outlined on page 17 of the Division's Vegetation Guidelines (Guidelines for <br />Compliance with [.and Use and Vegetation Requirements of the Colorado Mined land <br />Reclamation Board for Coal Mining, t~ctober 1988), though because reclaimed area <br />comparisons were made with standards rather than with reference area means, actual <br />methods would have followed those outlined on pages 171 through 173 of Sokal and <br />Rohlf (1981), Biome :The PrinciRlgs and Practice of Statistics in Biolog~al Research <br />had a statistical comparison been necessary <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.