My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE117745
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
200000
>
PERMFILE117745
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:13:29 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 4:14:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982055
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
ADDENDUM A SUITABILITY EVALAUATION OF THE RATON CREEK MINE REFUSE COVER MATERIALS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• maximum Cu value associated with the Raton Creek Mine overburden and bench <br />materials was 6 ppm. Thus all of these materials appear to be suitable with <br />respect to Cu levels. The suspect level of Pb is given by Schafer (1979) as <br />20 ppm. The maximum Pb value associated with these materials was 2.4 ppm, <br />meaning that all of the overburden and bench materials are suitable with <br />respect to Pb concentrations. Both Sutton et. al. (1981) and Schafer (1979) <br />report that the suspect level of Hg is 0.5 ppm. Since all of the Raton Creek <br />Mine overburden and bench materials were found to have Pb concentrations less <br />than 0.01 ppm, these materials appear suitable with respect to this <br />parameter. The suspect level for Zn is reported by Schafer (1979) to be 40 <br />ppm. The maximum Zn concentration associated with the Raton Creek Mine <br />overburden and bench materials was 16 ppm. Since all of the materials tested <br />have Zn values below the suspect level these materials appear suitable with <br />respect to Zn concentrations. <br />RECOMMENDATIONS AND SUMMARY. <br />This evaluation demonstrates that the Ratan Creek Mine overburden and <br />bench materials that will be used as cover materials for the reclamation of <br />the refuse pile are relatively clean with respect to their chemical and <br />physical suitability as topsoil substitute and overburden root zone <br />materials. Three potential limitations are evident from this evaluation: <br />- Heavy clayey textures were observed <br />- OC was exceeded in two samples <br />• - High rack fragment contents were observed <br />None of these limitations are of significant concern with respect to usage <br />of these materials as refuse cover media because: <br />- The clayey nature of the refuse cover materials, although marginal, <br />is more suitable from a textural standpoint than the nature of the <br />soil materials which will be used for reclamation of the area. <br />- The two samples in which OC was exceeded comprise less than two <br />percent of the material to be used for refuse cover. These zones <br />are only 1.1 and 2.8 feet in thickness respectively, and will be <br />sufficiently diluted during the removal and replacement process to <br />eliminate this concern. <br />Elevated rock fragment levels are characteristic of all soil <br />materials in the area. Existing soils which are located on <br />adjacent undisturbed areas and stockpiled soil materials have rock <br />fragment contents higher than that of the potential cover <br />materials. Since elevated rock fragment contents are typical of <br />the area, this limitation should not adversely effect the utility <br />of these materials as cover soil materials. <br />It is recommended that a detailed evaluation of the refuse materials be <br />conducted to determine whether or not four feet of cover are actually <br />necessary. A preliminary evaluation of these materials, and existing <br />. reclamation studies that have been conducted nearby by Colorado State <br />University at Morley and Heston, Colorado on refuse materials much older than <br />those found at the Raton Creek Mine, suggests that successful reclamation <br />with a thick soil cover may not be necessary or desirable from an <br />environmental or regulatory standpoint. It must be pointed out, that the <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.