Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />we regard as your baseline water quality. Samples must be taken and analyzed from each of the five sampling <br />locations, beginning with the fall 2001 samples, and continuing oo a quarterly basis as possible (given accessibility <br />constraints). After the baseline has been established, we will discuss any continuing need for future sampling. <br />7. The four settling ponds will be excavated deeper and have ditches into and out of them. It appears from your <br />reclamation plan that they are to be part of the permanent landscape. Therefore, as part of the earthwork involved <br />in increasing their effectiveness and capacity, please ensure that pond embankments also conform to the final 3:1 <br />gradient and become stabilized by revegetating them. This will help allow the sttucNres to remain onsite after <br />reclamation, and not permanently be part of the bonded reclamation liability (such as costs for their repair, 5nal <br />grading and revegetation, or removal). Please comment on this. <br />8. The settling ponds must be excavated deeper and the embankments built up for increased impoundment <br />capacity. The excavation will generate earthen material, which might best be saved for reclamation purposes if it is <br />seen to be a good quality soil, rather than using it in constructing the embankment. The embankments may be <br />constructed from other materials generated onsite, such as less fertile subsoils or waste rock materials, if they meet <br />the need for impermeability. This is simply a suggestion, but I would welcome your comments. <br />Exhibit D -Reclamation Plan (Rule 6.3.41 <br />9. The reclamation of the disturbed areas will include topsoil replacement and seeding. [will calculate costs based <br />on the plan provided by the NRCS which you committed to following, and for the areas and distances shown on <br />your newest maps. <br />10. As mentioned above, all topsoil to be replaced will be generated by stripping new areas prior to disturbance. <br />Some areas of new disturbance, such as the pond inslopes and floors, plus ditches, will not be retopsoiled. <br />However, a couple areas of existing disturbance, including the portal area and existing waste dump, will be <br />retopsoiled during reclamation. This requires that the limited soil generated be spread even thinner, making the <br />careful salvage and protection of all soils very important. You have committed to doing this. <br />11. For bond calculation purposes, [must try to quantify the topsoil task. Do you feel it is reasonable to assume <br />that soils may range from 0" to 12" or more, and that the areas to be reclaimed should receive a layer at least 6" in <br />depth? Unless you respond otherwise, I will use this figure in my initial bond calculations. <br />l2. You state that none of the roadways in the permit area will be reclaimed, and no culverts will be removed. <br />Please ensure therefore that adequate drainage and erosion control is implemented during the life of the operation, <br />so that repair or removal costs do not have to be included in the bond amount. If stream crossing structures become <br />degraded, their removal cost will probably be added to the bond amount. <br />13. Final closure of the portal will have to be more substantial than a locked grate. Backfilled rubble, probably <br />with a drain pipe on the floor, is generally regarded as a safer and more permanent method for reclaiming the lower <br />portal that you will use. If there is no disturbance to the upper portal, and no additional underground openings <br />created, closure of the single lower portal will be all that is required. Unless you respond otherwise, I will use this <br />method in my cost calculations. <br />Other Items <br />14. Once it becomes available, please submit a copy of the right-of--entry agreemenC for the 2.09 acres of BLM <br />land, since entering the area for mining-related purposes is not permitted until this office receives it. My <br />understanding is that this agreement is separate from the access road agreement, since that is appazently between <br />the BLM and Ophir-Nevada. The documentation you provided of the access road agreement between Midas <br />Mining Company and Ophir-Nevada includes an expiration date, but not much other information. Lf applicable, <br />please describe any use or timeframe limitations, construction or maintenance requirement, bonding or other <br />conditions which may be imposed by BLM on Ophir-Nevada. L°there are no such restrictions, please state such. <br />