My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE116781
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
200000
>
PERMFILE116781
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:12:34 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 2:44:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1981307
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
2/24/1982
Doc Name
BRODERICK & GIBBONS INC FOUNTIAN PIT FILE 81-307
From
CITY OF COLORADO SPRINGS
To
DNR
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.r ~ ~ CITY O <br />DEPAP <br />' INTER - I <br />F.om: Vic Ecklund, Conservation Pl <br />COLORADO SPRING <br />ENi OF PUBLIC UTILITIES <br />~FFICS M<;MORANDUM <br />r <br />Date: February 19, 1982 <br />To: J. D. Phillips, Utilities Dit~ector <br />Subject: BRODERICK AND GIBBONS MININGAND RECLAMATION PERMIT <br />I have reviewed those materi <br />reclamation and the report b <br />attached map is taken from B <br />delineated the approximate b <br />easements (in dark green) an <br />(in blue). The three soil t <br />82) and orange (Type 86). <br />s dealing with the soils, the plans for <br />the Soil Conservation Service (SCE). The <br />derick and Gibbons Exhibit I, on which I have <br />ndaries of the subject property, our utilities <br />adjacent major Hanna Ranch Complex facilities <br />es are shown in yellow (Type 30)> red (Type <br />With the information provided <br />erosion in Type 82 (red). Th <br />lines due to the proposed 3:1 <br />fact (from the text of Exhibi <br />to revegetate." The SCS repo <br />property: "Slopes of 6:1 or <br />point out that "In general, t <br />as the percent slope decrease <br />problem or` high hazard of win <br />emissions in the area. <br />I feel more information is neE <br />relate to ootential erosion pl <br />that must be implemented to pl <br />immediately adjacent to the sl <br />~~i <br />Vic`'Eck~nd <br />Conservation Planner <br />UTE/smc <br />Attachment <br />we could expect a high hazard of water <br />s would create problems with our utilities <br />slopes along the easements, and the stated <br />I) that "These soils are very difficult <br />t states, with regard to the entire subject <br />latter are much more desirable." They also <br />e chances of vegetation establishment increase <br />." Type 30 (yellow) poses an additional <br />erosion, which could increase fugitive dust <br />d on the particular soil conditions as they <br />lems, and the minimum reclamation standards <br />ect our utilities lines traversing and <br />ect property. <br />oemruaco vu n~ iaso <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.