Laserfiche WebLink
The MLRB acted arbitrarily and capriciously when it stated in paragraph 15 <br />of the MLRB Order, <br />Applicant provided revised maps C-1, C-2A, C-2B and <br />C-ZC, which accurately show the location of the quarry <br />entrance and the location of all permanent man-made <br />structures within 200 feet of the quarry entrance. <br />R. 2678-2679. The statutory requirement is not to show the location of the <br />permanent man-made structures within 200 feet of the quarry entrance. The <br />statutory requirement is to show the permanent man-made structures within 200 <br />feet of the "affected land." The MLRB, in its own Order, demonstrates that the <br />mapping requirement for a Section 112 Permit has not been met. <br />In its Answer Brief, the Applicant asserts that the remedy for a deficient <br />map, as required by § 34-32.5-112(3), C.R.S., is an analysis of the potential effect <br />of blast vibrations. Applicant Br. at 18. Logically, the appropriate remedy for a <br />deficient map is a revised and corrected map, not a blasting analysis. The statutory <br />requirements for a Section 112 mining permit are clear. Section 34-32.5-112(3), <br />C.R.S. requires a map of the affected lands and everything within 200 feet. When <br />the mapping requirement has not been met, then the requirements of the permit <br />have not been met, and the permit should not be issued. <br />Accordingly, the MLRB's Order is arbitrary or capricious, a denial of the <br />Sanitation District's statutory right to be included in the mapping required by the <br />9 <br />