My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE115717
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
200000
>
PERMFILE115717
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:11:41 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 1:14:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2004067
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
6/28/2007
Doc Name
Reply Brief
From
Colorado Court of Appeals
To
MLRB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The mining permit and the CDOT access permit require the Applicant to do <br />construction work on the highway. The highway is an off-site road that will be <br />substantially upgraded to support the operation of the quarry. The CDOT permit <br />will no doubt require re-grading, re-seeding, etc. within the right-of--way when the <br />work in completed. <br />However, the work required of the Applicant to significantly widen the <br />highway to mitigate the effects of the mining operation has not been done. In other <br />words, the affected land has not "been reclaimed" under any possible interpretation <br />of the words. <br />The plain language of the statutory exception relied upon by the MLRB <br />cannot be stretched as far as the MLRB asserts. Off-site roads that will be <br />substantially upgraded to support the operation of the quarry in the future and on <br />which no work has even begun cannot be "land that has been reclaimed pursuant to <br />an approved plan or otherwise." Accordingly, the MLRB's interpretation of its <br />enabling statute as asserted in its Answer Brief is arbitrary and capricious and <br />beyond its statutory authority. <br />By its erroneous interpretation of the statute, the MLRB excludes all of the <br />Sanitation District's sewer treatment facility from the mapping and other <br />requirements of a permit relating to significant manmade structures within 200 feet <br />of the "affected land" except the Sanitation District's domestic well. <br />s <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.