Laserfiche WebLink
2-9 <br />• be Vtillzed and them the cutslope shall be continued. When the <br />er:isting sly?pe of the topography e%::hibits a natural slope of <br />1h1:1V, aril a degree of cor~solidatinr~ which will pr.?vide a safety <br />factor of 1_~, a eutslope of 11-{=1V shall be- used to minimize- arc-a <br />disturbed. For typical section of access read tc~ McClave Canyon <br />arni accecc haul road to refVSC disposal area, see Figures <br />~.~--i.o..~_ arrd ~.~-/-•.~'_: respectively. All err~t~anl::rt~er~ts to tie <br />constructed shall be n,? stee-per than 2H: 1V. <br />r,.~nstrucfic~r~ of roads tip both the refuse- disposal area and the <br />MU=1an~ r_•;rryc~n rr~inesite will require cutslopes in certain areas. <br />Where p~?ssible, these slt~pes have be-en designed at 1. `H: 1V to <br />comply with C:MLR regulations. Of the four major cutslopes <br />• required, ~~nly cane sl~~pe can the l9u=lane Canyon access read exec-cds <br />tY~e 1.~H:1V limitation. <br />~.tability analyses have- been performed c. r. these Cuts. !~utcrc~ps <br />identified in the fie-ld were used to assUmc- stiTf boundaries used <br />in the analyses. With cane e:<:ception, sail parame-tors used in the <br />analyses were these from testing performed fnr earlier work: on the <br />Munger l~~aul read. The parameters assigned were those for a <br />cc.l luvial type- s~?il. <br />Inspection of the three cut areas for the refuse disp~?sal area <br />read indicated that two? of the three cuts would be in a material <br />. tF~at would rnc~st prc~bat~ly be considered col'luvial. The- third cut, <br />located at 2~ta~tior, 3r)+np, would be in a blocky, weathered rc~c4~:. <br />The ,loin'tinr~ :~f this material appears to dip into the proposed cut <br />5/8/85 <br />