My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE114868
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
200000
>
PERMFILE114868
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:10:58 PM
Creation date
11/25/2007 12:12:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981016
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
violations socioeconomics PAR review
Section_Exhibit Name
APPENDIX XXIX Section XXIX.3 to Appendix XXXII
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
156
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• The indirect job slots were assumed to occur in towns that currently possess <br />support business services. Most of the indirect slots were distributed to <br />Delta City, given its status ae n developing regional trade center. Almost <br />one-half of the new employees will probably reside in Delta, while one-fourth <br />will select the Paonia area. <br />The next section configures the impact of the demand for services created by <br />the proposed Hawk's Nest West's expansion. <br />B. Service Capabilities <br />Assuming the settlement patterns displayed in Table IV-1, then the following <br />service capabilities located in these towns can be examined for adequacy. One <br />of the difficulties in assessing the strain of growth on municipal services is <br />that in the absence of zoning requirements there is no guarantee that in- <br />migrants will choose a town over the unincorporated areas. The 1980 <br />Preliminary Census indicated that greater growth occurred in the areas <br />• surrounding towns than in the towns themselves. Should the settlement <br />patterns occur in the unincorporated areas, then the responsibility for <br />providing water and sewer services fall on the homeowner. Other service <br />responsibilities tend to fall more heavily on Countywide agents, e. g., school <br />and fire districts, County Sheriff, etc. However, assuming that the new <br />residents do locate in towns where limited housing is available, then the <br />following analysis presents the worst-case scenario. <br />Table IV-2 summarizes the service supply in relationship to the 257 additional <br />people generated by Hawk's Nest's expansion. Of the 257 people, 250 will <br />reside in Delta County, with the remaining seven locating in Somerset, <br />Gunnison County. Given the greater influx of workers into Delta County, it <br />will receive careful scrutiny. As indicated throughout, Delta County has <br />traditionally been the home of the majority of WSCC's workforce. Further, <br />given the geographical difficulty of traversing from Somerset to Gunnison, the <br />indirect employment also was largely generated in Delta County (Chapter III). <br />• Each municipal service is specifically addressed. Again, Table IV-2 <br />graphically displays which services will be strained beyond capacity by the <br />addition of 257 people. <br />50 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.