Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Rationale for Approval Recommendation Page 8 <br />Application for Stone Gravel Pit <br />Permit No. M-97-089 <br />location will be surrounded by spill containment berm of sufficient capacity to ensure <br />containment of 1 50% of the stored fluids and lined with 80 mil impermeable liner; <br />Commitment to not utilize any acid forming chemicals and not produce or expose any toxic <br />chemicals or substances; <br />Reconstruction of stable intermittent drainage channel to convey upland drainage through <br />affected and reclaimed areas; and <br />Utilization of 2 tons/acre mulch for reclaimed areas to reduce speed and volume of runoff, <br />control erosion and encourage establishment of vegetative cover. <br />Response - 6.h., i., j., and k. -Application indicates that water, necessary to support <br />project requirements, shall be purchased from off-site water sources. Application indicates <br />that approximately 10,000 gpd may be necessary to support crushing operation and up to <br />50,000 gpd for dust suppression, total water consumption is estimated at 60,000 gpd <br />during active crushing operations. <br />Response - 6.c, and I. -Applicant has indicated that groundwater was not encountered in <br />the exploration test pits excavated to 12' depths throughout the proposed site. Applicant <br />has indicated that evidence of groundwater exposure is absent for the un-reclaimed <br />excavations located in the immediate area and which were excavated to similar depths. <br />Additionally, comment received from Office of State Engineer, Division of Water <br />Resources, has not indicated potential conflict with groundwater issues. DMG review of <br />the application has not identified potential adverse impacts to performance of private wells. <br />Response - 6.c. -BLM is the surface management agency, has reviewed the application, <br />and has completed an Environmental Analysis for the proposed operation. BLM <br />Environmental Analysis states: <br />"Water Quality, Surface or Ground: From the description of the mining plan submitted by Mr. <br />Stone, no impacts to water quality would be expected. The general slope of the site is around <br />3%. However, possible silt and turbidity from thunder showers to areas immediately adjacent <br />and downstream of the mining operation could cause minimal impacts to public and private <br />land. It may be prudent to place berms or dams in small intermittent drainages downstream <br />from mining operation areas (including stockpiling areas) to protect from local surface runoff <br />effects. Since these drainages are essentially headwater, the area drained is relatively small." <br />7. Exhibit H -- Wi/dlife /nformation -- is inadequate tBel% MPC, Stills) <br />a. Meaningful description of wildlife resources is absent /stills) <br />b. Description of operations effect to wildlife is absent (Stills! <br />c. Location provides winter range and migration route for deer and Mtn. lion /Srllisl <br />d. Description of effect to wildlife from increased human activity, including noise and traffic from <br /> material haul trucks and water trucks is absent /Stills! <br />e. Effect on listed threatened and endangered species not addressed /Brats/ <br />