My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE113452
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
200000
>
PERMFILE113452
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:09:36 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 10:40:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
4/18/2005
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 8v Impoundment Documentation for Existing Area 1 Pit Temporary Water Storage Basin
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
upgradient reclaimed surface mine areas and routes it around the Area 1 Basin to Pond D, so wazer cornributions <br />from run-on are sinularly negligible. For design dewatering purposes, the contribtuion from incident precipitazion <br />for the Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) event (131 inches over 24hours) is 5.6 acre-feet, or approxrmately <br />4.4 percent of pond capacity and slightly over 1-foot of depth with the pond neaz its maximum design water level <br />With a capacity of 250 gpm, the Area 1 Basin pumping station can discharge the accumulated precipitation from the <br />PMP over a period of approximately 5 days. <br />Contributions from and Management of Mine Water Dischazge Flows -Mine water inflows pumped from the <br />mine are piped to the surface at either Site 109 or the Fish Creek Borehole (Site 1 I5). From either of these <br />locations, the water can be piped to either the Area 1 Basin or the Million-Gallon Tank. Water pumped from the <br />Area 1 Basin can be routed to the: 1) Prep Plant, 2) Mine water recycling line, and/or 3) Pond D for discharge to <br />Foidel Creek. Water routed from the Area 1 Basin to either locations 1 or 2, above, is piped to a de-sander, <br />located at an old well site. A return line from the de-sander allows back-flush water to be returned to the pit. <br />The location of these lines is shown on Map 24 of the PAP. The ability to discharge directly into Foidel Creek <br />will be dictated by downstream water quality in Trout Creek, whether or not the Fish Creek Borehole is <br />discharging, and the rate of discharge. Pond D serves as the treazment facility for discharge poirt[ 005 (Site 84) <br />under ®PS Pemtit CO-0027154. Any discharge from the Area 1 Basin will be treated in Pond D to meet <br />applicable effluent limitations under this CDPS Pemut, before being released to Foidel Creek An overflow channel <br />has been constructed az the lowest topographic point on the Area 1 Pit highwall, and conforms to applicable <br />requirements for temporary diversions under Rule 4.05.3. Designs for the overflow channel are provided in Table <br />51, Overflow Channel Specifications, of the PAP. <br />The DEPOSITS model (Ward et. al 1979) was used to determine the capacity and effectiveness of Sedimentation <br />Pond D to handle inflows fmm all tribrtary sources, during a 10-year, 24-hour precipitation event. The output from <br />the DEPOSITS model is included in Exhibit 28, Deposits Model Output, of the PAP. Several assumptions were <br />made in calibrating the DEPOSITS model First, it was assttmed that two sourt:es of water will be tributary to Pond <br />D: drainage from the upgradient spoils through Ditch D-3, and discharge from the underground mine through <br />Ditch D-2. The inflow to the pond from these sources was assumed to fill the impoundment to the sediment <br />storage level; thus dead storage was set equal to the pem~anent pool volume. Second, it was assumed that the runoff <br />from the design event will enter the pond from all tributary areas simultaneously, without regazd to lag time due to <br />diversion. These assumptions make the flood muting and sedimentation analyses rrrore conservative. <br />The inflow hydrognph calculated bythe DEPOSITS model is derived by applying the 10-year, 24hour SCS Type II <br />storm and the SCS unit hydmgraph to derive the runoff response. The outflow hydrograph is derived by calculating <br />the cumulative volume in the pond and applying stage-storage relationships to detemvne head on the decant orifice, <br />which is used in the orifice equation to derive the discharge. The outflow seditnern-graph is derived by applying the <br />variable rates of inflow and outflow to determine detention time, and appl}dng represernative patticle size <br />distributions to Stokes' Iawin an iterative analysis. <br />The output from the DEPOSITS model shows that the average effluetn concetnration from Pond D of Total <br />Suspended Solids ('ISS) is 20.7 mg/L This u in compliance with the average monthly effuern limitation for TSS set in <br />the GDPS pemrit. Based on this analysis and monitoring records for pI-~ total iron, total manganese, oil and grease, and <br />other pazameters, the effluent limitation set for discharge point 005 (Site 84 in CDPS Pemri[ 00-0027154 are expected <br />to be met. Therefore, either operation of the Area 1 Basin as a temporarywater storage basin or coal wore disposal area <br />will not compmmise the existing sedirrrent control plan and will not degrade surface water qualiry. <br />Water Ri¢hts -Beneficial use of mine water discharge from both Site 109 and the Fish Creek Borehole (Site 115) is <br />pemutted under weer rights filings, File Nos. 12593 through 12595 and TC~'s Plan of Augrr~ntation, as amended <br />(Case No. 90CW99). <br /> <br />TR 05-47 Ex8V-3 Revised - Mazch 2005 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.