Laserfiche WebLink
potential hazard exists, the CDMG will be promptly notified of the potential hazard and of any appropriate <br />emergency procedures formulated and/or implemented to protect public safety and remediate the potential hazard <br />On completion of operations, a is anticipated that the Area 1 Basin will be reclaimed, as described under Section <br />2.05.4(2)(c) of the PAP. Reclamation will involve backEilling the basin area with either coal waste or spoils, <br />placemem of a minimum of 4 feet of suitable spoil (if used for coal waste only), topsoil replacement, and <br />revegetation. <br />~oil~s~tinfl Disc}rarp~e, Grotmd Water Movement, and Quality Considerations <br />The Area 1 Basin is designated as a coal waste disposal site, has been used for coal waste disposal in the past, and <br />maybe utilized for this propose in the future. When the coal preparation plain was constructed and commusroned, <br />however, all coal waste previously placed in the Area 1 Pit was removed and run through the coal preparazron plant <br />to recover the associated coal The Area 1 Pit is an open excavation with a bedrock highwafl on the north and west <br />sides and a spoil slope on the south and east sides. The bedrock on the highwall side contains a sequence of <br />saturated sandstone and siltstone units referred to as the "overburden aquifer". The characteristics of the <br />overburden aquifer are fully described in the PAP text under Section 2.04.7. The permeability and storativiry of the <br />overburden aquifer have been detemtined by conducting pump tests at several locations in the pemrit area At the <br />EnergyNo. 1Mine, average horizontal permeability is 2.9 gallons per dayper square foot, vertical permeabiliryis 0.1 <br />gpd/fr2, and storativiry is 1.7 x 10.4 (umt-less). The average yield of wells penetrating the overburden aquifer rs 17.6 <br />gpm Hydraulic conductivities in the overburden aquifer are, therefore, very low, except in localized areas where the <br />aquifer has been extensively fractured by joints and fauns. <br />The reclaimed spoil material up-dip from the pit forms an unconfined aquifer which serves to recharge the local <br />ground water system Water from snowmen and rainfall infiltrates into the spoils to the floor of the former mine pit <br />and then moves down-dip along the pit floor where it tends to pool against the highwalL Based both on calculated <br />. values and previous monitoring of this area, inflows to the Area 1 Basm from spoil spring discharge are estimated at <br />a ma~nmum of approximate}y 35 gpm, with peak spoil spring discharge occurring dumng a brief period (a few days to <br />a maximum of two months) during late spnng. Since the Area 1 Basin is at the final highwall, the limited volume of <br />water resuhing from infikration through the spoils water tends to collect and accrunulate m the pit. The head of any <br />spoil water accumulation in the pit normally exceeds the elevation of the piezometric sruface in the adjacent <br />overburden aquifer, consequently spoil water accrurnilations infihrate itrto the highwall, providing recharge to the <br />overburden aquifer. From this area, ground water flows to the nonh under the gradient of prezometric suuface as <br />shown on Map 13, Twentymile Park Hydrology. <br />Strip mitring operations at the Energy No. 1 Mine ceased in 1980. Daring the mining operations, groundwater <br />inflow from the overburden in the highwall was minimal. Since that time, infikration of water from rainfall and <br />snowmelt imp the reclaimed spoils has ceased leaching of the spoil materials, and this leachate has accumulated in <br />the final pit at the bottom of the dip-slope. The chemistry of the leachate water, as well as the water level and <br />chemistry of ground water in the overburden aquifer, were monitored on a monthly basis during afive-year period <br />from 1979 through 1983. Monitoring records are listed in Table 50, Energy Mine No. 1 Pit Water Quality, of the <br />PAP. As shown below, actual concentrations of TDS fluctuate, due to seasonal variations in snowmen and <br />precipitation: <br />Year # Samples Min D Max. TDS Ave. TDS <br />1979 21 2080 3850 2948.1 <br />1980 37 700 3320 2626.8 <br />1981 22 456 2920 2608.5 <br />1982 17 324 3320 2863.1 <br />1983 24 520 4400 2757.9 <br />Incident Precivitation and Run-on -The surface area of the Area 1 Basin is only approximately 5.1 acres, so <br />water contributions from normal incident precipitation aze negligible (0.77 ac-fr fora 10-year, Z4-hr event or <br />0.61 percent of pond capacity). An upgradient diversion ditch (Ditch D-3) imereepts any surface runoff from <br />TR 05-47 Ex8 V-2 Revised -March 2005 <br />