My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE112522
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
200000
>
PERMFILE112522
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:08:52 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 9:35:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
TAB 6 GEOLOGY AND OVERBURDEN ASSESSMENT
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mixing and Mitigation of Unsuitable Overburden Material. Zonas of unsuitable material were <br />identified at thirteen sample locations and are documented by parameter and sample interval in <br />Appendix 6-5. Effective mitigation measures will include avoidance, ameliorating reclamation <br />techniques, and blending, dilution, and/or burial by normal overburden handling. These <br />mitigative measures, also listed in Appendix 6-5, are discussed in further detail in Tab 21, <br />Minesoil Reconstruction. <br />Quality Control and Duplicate Samples. Quality control is an important part of the soil and <br />spoil monitoring program. One aspect of this quality control program is to have the primary <br />laboratory facility complete duplicate analyses on five to ten percent of the total samples and <br />on field-split blind samples. IML completed duplicated analyses on 3 of the 25 samples from <br />the southern mine block. IML also completed duplicate analyses on one field-split blind sample <br />from the southern mine block. The duplicate analyses, presented on the enclosed laboratory <br />reports in Appendix 6-3, were very comparable with the original samples. Variation between <br />the original and duplicate analyses data was not significant enough to change the suitability <br />classification of any sample. <br />Conclusions. Overburden characteristics at the Seneca II-W Mine reflect the variable <br />depositional environments of the coal-bearing strata of the Williams Fork Formation. Although <br />lateral and vertical variability exist, certain distinct physiochemical differences are apparent <br />• between some of the core holes, especially for the parameters pH, saturation percent, <br />conductivity, sulfate, nitrate-nitrogen, sand content, clay content, and manganese. As <br />discussed in the Mixing and Mitigation of Unsuitable Overburden section and Tab 27, Minesoil <br />Reconstruction, none of these parameters will impact overall spoil suitability. In most <br />instances, avoidance and typical overburden handling will effectively blend, dilute, bury, and <br />mitigate potentially inimical zones as documented in Appendix 6-5. <br />The major or significant concern within the Seneca 11-W study area is the excessive clay levels <br />found in the 60 feet of shale strata which overlies the Lennon coal seam. A less significant or <br />minor concern is the potential acidity associated with the Lennox coal seam and encapsulating <br />strata. These strata will be encountered primarily between the Lennox coal outcrop and final <br />highwall in the northwestern portion of the mine as shown on Exhibit 6-6, and in the <br />southern mine block as shown on Exhibit 6-6A. Typical <br />• <br />33 Revised 9/g8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.