My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE112503
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
200000
>
PERMFILE112503
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:08:51 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 9:34:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1994117
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
2/21/1995
From
GOLD HILL MILL MINING INC
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Nom, ~ ~9 y <br />Committee on Mining & the Environment <br /> <br />Gold Hill Town Meeting, Inc. <br />Gold Hill, Colorado <br />cnd„ueson ANNOTATED CONTENTS LIST ~w~we~.coeo3a; <br />Of a Submittal by the Boulder County Land Use <br />Department Staff to the Boulder County Board of <br />Adjustme~ in support of Docket 7t AP 9413, <br />Anneal reeardine allowable sources of ore for Gold <br />Hill ill, hearing date November 2, 1994 <br />Note: This summary has been prepared by the Gold Hill Committee on Mining and the <br />Environment (COME) to facilitate review by interested parties. Page number references are to <br />numbering added by COME to a copy of the Land Use Department submittal to the Boulder <br />County Board of Adjustment. Two blank sheets in the packet were not numbered, so total of <br />I IS deviates by 2 from original packet count. <br />Item 1, pp l - 4 Background, discussion and staff recommendation. <br />Backgrotmd consists of an abbreviated synopsis of Land-Use-Department- <br />related events from 1983 thru August 22, 1994. <br />Discussion notes that the Boulder County Zoning Resolution does not state <br />that milling (per se) is a use by right (there is a misstatement implying the <br />contrary in Steven O. Ellis Itr to Mark Steen dated January 9, 1985 -this <br />Itr not included in the present submittal; it is, however, cited by Munn in <br />Item 29); subordinate accessory uses are permitted on a property where a <br />principal use (i.e. mining) occurs. <br />Discussion notes further that Steen gave specific representation of the areas <br />he intended to none (See affidavit, Item t 2 at p 29). These representa- <br />tions were later acknowledged in negotiations with the Frazers on the <br />milling contract, see Item 23 at p 63) Under su-ict interpretation, the Gold <br />Hill Mill would only be allowed to mill ore from the property on which <br />it is located. The interpretation offered, however, would allow the sources <br />of ore represented to the Land Use Department at the time the mill was <br />proposed. <br />The term "ore" should include monzonite, since it may have multiple roles <br />in the milling process, thus cucumventing the purpose of the ore <br />restriction. <br />Staff recommendation is that the appeal be denied. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.