Laserfiche WebLink
-z- <br />2. Exhibit C requires the application/maps to portray adjacent land- <br />ownare, typo of present vegetation covering the affected land. Sae <br />item 3, acreage of affected lands ao roll. <br />IV. Exhibit D - Mining Plm <br />1. A 35.4 foot average thickenea of limaetnne is being removed with <br />8' - 12' actually being routnd through the pleat circuit. The <br />varying thickaeae of the overlying material moat be provided in <br />accordance with Ezhibit D of Rule 2. For instance, what amo~te of <br />soil materials, gravels, shale, etc., will be removed throughout <br />the mine area. (This can be ezpraesed in ranges.) The original <br />exhibit referenced clay lenses. It appears that thin was omitted <br />from the revision. More specific information is required. Also, <br />the overall depth of miadng should 6e indicated. <br />2. What amounts of sandetonn will be removed4 <br />3. Paragraph (a), gaga 2, Hxhibit D, references phases to ba followed <br />within each cut. If each cut 1, 3, 5, 7, etc., is backfillad with <br />ovarburdan from the precaediag cut, will cut mmbar 11 ba backfilledl <br />Will ovarburdan replaced on the old quarry floor remain theta upon <br />reclamation? Will the sequenced for the even numbered cute 2 through <br />20 proceed in the same moaner ae the odd numbered cuts? If so, this <br />2`~ ehwld be indicated. Odd numbered cute 13 through 21 should not be <br />~;/~~ included in the mine plan given the uncertainty o! Chair location <br />pending exploration. <br />~P. <br />Rt~'k` 4. Paragraph C. water divereiona and impoundments is unclear as to the <br />grit matter of rerouting Bear Creek. If the pond in the rest area i.a to <br />,, be utilised to reroute Bear Creek, it moat be included in the acreage <br />~~ ~ of affected lands. Secondly, hot will diverted water from Bear Creak <br />be channeled from the pond to the Arkansas RiverY Regarding the <br />applicability of discharge perms d and 404 permit, Ideal Cement is <br />advised to contact Fred Matter, Water Quality Control Division, <br />Colorado 8aparemant of Health. <br />V. Exhibit E - Baclamation Plea <br />2 w~ Paragraph iii references elopes lase •teap than the original surface. <br />~~ ~~ What ie the elope of the original surface? Thia has not bean <br />~, referenced is the mining plan. (Other than as shown on the map.) <br />R~r.~n!»~- The reclamation plan map shows Final contours in the quarry areas <br />!. ~•).~ (east and real). Hor will these ba attained in the east pit, is <br />particular, if exploration hss not determined how and there the <br />phases rill occur and to what depth? What amounts of overburden, etc., <br />rill be placed in each cut to achieve final contours m show on the <br />mapl The Soil Conservation Service indicates that elppee should be <br />flatter than 3:1. The reclamation plan references elopes flatter <br />than 2:1. This should be corrected. Flatter than 2:1 could be 2.1:1 <br />as a matter of eztrema. Final contours for the refuse areas are <br />not shorn. (Information concerning eixe, height, width. elope, <br />nature of material, etc.. should be presented.) The particulate, <br />ae required for the revegetaiion portion of the reclamation plan, <br />have not been presented. Exhibit E, page 6, references Soil Conser- <br />vation Service recommandatione. These have not been presented <br />(indicated ae attached). A morn specific reclamation plan time- <br />