Laserfiche WebLink
iii iiiuiiiiiiiiiii <br />June 7, 1478 <br />Ideal Basic Industries. Ins. <br />P.O. Soz 349 <br />Florence. CO. 81226 <br />ATTN: Mr. Bob Marsh <br />88: Portland Quarry. Our file Q77-344. <br />Dear Mr. Marsh: <br />A review of the Portland Quarry application indicates that conaidarabla in- <br />fotmatioa ie needed to correct or otherwise clarify the application. The <br />following ie ea outlins of the items nquiring additional work. <br />[. Acreage of Affected Lands <br />1. Yage 2 indicstea a change is acnaga from 1,146 scree to 1.588 <br />scree. The cover latter nferancee an addition of 210 acres. <br />Tha difference between the fignrss above ie 442 acres. This moat <br />be eorzectad. <br />2. The concnte quarry is tihown on Bzhibit B, page 2, does not appear <br />to bs within ttu Ideal property boundary. I uauma thin is the 210 <br />acres rafereacsd in the cows latter. Also, all aaillbits should <br />include reterances to this quarry area. <br />3. Bafusa dumps associated wish the plant have bean included is the <br />parait application. The plant area has bean omitted. The pleat <br />area should aLo be included in aifaeted acreage. (Ciwn the <br />location of the plant and iacluaioa of the nfnaa dumps.) Still the <br />sandstone and 8iutona sad overburden be mined or otherwise removed <br />in banchna? If so, what lifts and terraces? (dimensions) <br />II, Exhibit A - Legal Description <br />The legal description moat be to quarter quarter section at least. <br />lieferencee to tracts as recorded in a deed book dose not enable us <br />to accurately nviw the legal description. <br />III. E:)uibit B - Hape <br />1. The maps presented should reference a definite permit area. For <br />instance, page 3 of Exhibit D references a topsoil/overburden <br />storage area south of U. 5. 50. Is this within the desired permit <br />area? If ao. it should ba indicated on the map. ,~ <br />