Laserfiche WebLink
Suly 31, 1980 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />request for vacious regulatory approvals and permits is to allow fur [lie <br />Wining and exploring of an adjacent area encompassed within a recently issued <br />Federal Coal Lease C-22777 and to bring ilarr Strip 111 as so expanded, and the <br />11:irr Prep Plant into compliance with the Permanent Regulatory Program. <br />The within application of. Kerr Coal for approval of its mining plan and for <br />state and federal permits is the next and last step prior [o the commencement <br />of mining nn Federal Lease C-22777 issued on July 1, 1980, pursuant to [he <br />Emergency Leasing Criteria set forth in 43 CFR Part 3425. Mining of the coal <br />resucves contained in Federal Lease C-22777 is necessary to maintain employ- <br />ment and production levels and to meet Sanding contracts. <br />:Jithou[ regulatory approval of the accompanying application by Fehruary 1, <br />Io81, coal production of Kerr Coal will plummet and its operations will he <br />severely curtailed, if not halted altogether. Employees wilt he laid off, <br />defaults under existing contracts will occur, and in [he broader perspective, <br />the nation's critical energy shortage will be aggravated. 1oreover, failure <br />to obtain all necessary regulatory approvals by February 1, 1981 will result <br />in an absolute increase of 14Y, in the unemployment rate in Jackson County, <br />Colorado when the 114 emnloyees of Kerr Coal are laid off. <br />In an effort to bring [he problem to [he attention of the Office of Surface <br />inning Reclamation 6 Enforcement ("OSit") and "1LRB and to facilitate and expe- <br />dite review of this application, Kerr Coal has held a series of meetings with <br />_ OSM and MLRR repcesen[atives throughout the spring and summer of 1980 for the <br />purpose of discussing and reaching some understanding on the permit format, <br />design criteria for certain structures in the mining area, and environmental <br />baseline information requirements in a wide variety of areas. The substance <br />of these discussions, including detailed confirmation of baseline parameters, <br />has heen set foctli in correspondence from Kerr Coal to OSM and representa- <br />tives of the Colorado MLRR. <br />Moreover, we must emphasize that [he applicatLon is not for a new mine Sn <br />virgin country. On the contrary, the application encompasses an existing <br />operation that has heen producing significant quantities of coal for over <br />five years. Kerr Coal is a well-respected operation in the local community <br />with an excellent reclamation record. Equally important, the application <br />does not seek to expand the existing levels of production requiring added <br />employees or significantly greater levels of disturbance. Mining will simply <br />proceed logically into the adjacent newly acquired Federal Coal Lease. No <br />new railroad transportation or support facilities will be required. On the <br />other hand, delay in the approval of the permit application will have devas- <br />tating repercussions on the community and the prospects for successful recla- <br />mation of previously disturbed areas. <br />Both OSM and the State have significant familiarity with on-going operations <br />of Kerr Coal. The MLRB has evaluated the Kerr Coal operation thoroughly in <br />the course of numerous permit and permit admendment applications over [he <br />past several years. Since much of [he present application covers on-going <br />operations which have been scrutinized previously under [he Interim Regula- <br />tions and prioc state law, it 1s hoped [ha[ the past familiarity will allow <br /> <br />