Laserfiche WebLink
to contain sensitive sites occurred within the buffer zone; <br />f <br />h <br />b <br />l <br />f • <br />to <br />acilitate an assessment o <br />t <br />e pro <br />ity of sensitive <br />abi <br />site occurrence; and if possible to locate sensitive sites <br />within the buffer zone. <br />Inspection was conducted in several forms. The most <br />frequent method used was to make observations during access <br />in and out of the Seneca II life-of-the-mine boundary. Since <br />a 100% cultural resource inventory was taking place within <br />the life-of-the-mine boundary, daily. access through the buffer <br />zone, on foot and by vehicle, was necessary. Therefore, it <br />was possible to inspect various portions of the buffer zone. <br />Other portions of the buffer zone were observed from within <br />the life-of-the-m.ine boundary during the 100% cultural resource <br />inventory. Crew members had to traverse the entire length <br />of the boundary during the inventory within the mine. Further- <br />more, portions of the crew occasionally had to wait for the <br />rest of the crew when performing transects of unequal length. <br />This time, when available, was spent in observing the buffer <br /> <br />zone and in making an occasional transect through the portions • <br />of the buffer zone. <br />Finally, all of the data produced by the methods detailed <br />above, and recovered from the Seneca II .cultural"resource <br />inventory, as well. as data from the Seneca II-Ld project which <br />is five miles west, was consolidated, and a determination <br />was made. <br />• <br />4 <br />