My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE112056
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
200000
>
PERMFILE112056
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:08:28 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 9:07:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982054
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
9/15/1989
Doc Name
CARBON JUNCTION MINE C-82-054 PERMIT RENEWAL AND CIVIL PENALTIES
From
PUEBLO COAL INC
To
MLR
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />,~ <br />State of~Colorado <br />Sept. 15, 1989 <br />I am submitting a revised draft of the reclamation cost in the <br />amount of $895,680.00. The only changes are wage rates, adjusted <br />to the $10.00 rate we day employees, elimination of contractors' <br />profits, and elimination of job foreman hours. We feel these <br />changes are realistic interpretations of actual reclamation <br />conditions. No changes were made for equipment ownership costs <br />vs equipment rental costs, however, we suggest that these rates <br />should be adjusted to ownership conditions. <br />Regarding our financial situation, Pueblo can expect no <br />assistance from our bank, Texas American Bank of Fort Worth, for <br />funding of additional bond coverage. Oakridge Energy, Inc. is <br />two-thirds owner of Pueblo Coal, Inc. You are aware Oakridge has <br />filed a $25,000,000.00 actual damages and $170,000,000.00 <br />punitive damages lawsuit against our operator, gas purchaser, et <br />al. This suit regards contractual claims: take-or-pay from 1984 <br />forward and underpayment of contract price from 1985 forward, as <br />-we71 as other grievances. The contractual claims are almost <br />certain to be decided in Oakridge's favor. The actual damages <br />for these two issues alone will be sufficient to service Oakridge <br />and Pueblo's cross-collateralized debt, guaranteed debt, taxes, <br />attorneys' fees, etc... The suit was filed November, 1986 and is <br />set for trial in January, 1990. Considering the continuances <br />granted to date and the Judges attitude, we expect the trial to <br />be heard no later than the Spring of 1990. our bank, as the <br />lawsuit has progressed, has been very supportive of Oakridge. <br />They have provided funding to Oakridge via a cash collateral <br />agreement to provide litigation costs and operating costs to get <br />us to trial. They can assist Oakridge only from its cash flow. <br />The cash collateral agreement allows the bank to determine the <br />usage of the funds. Pueblo would not be able to benefit from <br />Oakridge funds until the lawsuit is determined. At that time, we <br />expect both companies to be debt-free entities, aggressively <br />pursuing it's interests in the oil, gas and coal industries. <br />Enclosed is our check in the amount of $700.00 in payment of the, <br />civil penalty for violation C89-005. <br />We sincerely appreciate your working with us through the <br />prolonged period of financial reversal. <br />Present market conditions provide an enhanced opportunity for <br />coal sales. The upward trend of natural gas prices has made coal <br />more competitive in the energy market. We would like to resolve <br />the permit renewal issue so that we would have the opportunity to <br />bid for coal contracts as soon as possible. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.