Laserfiche WebLink
-~ t <br />PUEBLO COAL, INC. <br />400 FIRBT NATIONAL OUILDINO <br />WICHITA FALLS. TC%A3 7!!01 <br />FMONE e17/f 22•x'7 <br />4772 <br />Sept. 15, 1989 <br />Michael Long <br />State of Colorado <br />Mined Land Reclamation <br />215 Centennial Building <br />1313 Sherman Street <br />Denver, Colorado 80203-2273 <br />Re: Carbon Junction Mine, C-82-054 <br />Permit Renewal and Civil Penalties <br />Dear Mr. Long: <br />iii iiiiiiiiiiiii iii <br />999 <br />In response to your letter dated August 23, 1989, <br />recalculation for the above mine, I would like <br />couple of factors used in the recalculation. <br />concerning bond <br />to discuss a <br />1.) The contractor's hand book hourly wage rate: This rate is <br />based on union wages; we are non-union. We pay our <br />employees at the rate of $10.00 per hour: truck, dozer, <br />load operators etc... <br />2.) Contractors' profits: Pueblo would do this reclamation <br />work. We would not contract the work out. No job foreman <br />would be required. Jim Hendricks would oversee the <br />reclamation thus eliminating the 10$ contractors profit and <br />job foreman costs. <br />3.) Equipment ownership cost vs. equipment rental costs: <br />There would be no outside rental of equipment, with the <br />exception of possibly a scraper to do final spreading of <br />topsoil. We have a blade for spreading but final spreading <br />might require a scraper. In place of the 992 end loader, we <br />would use our Liebherr shovels for backfill. <br />1 <br />