Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Appendix 4.6-C; Exhibits 4.6-3, 4). <br />IT WAS MUTUALLY AGREED BY MLRD AND P&M TO DEFER RESPONSE TO THIS <br />COMMENT UNTIL THE MOFFAT STABILITY STUDY IS COMPLETED. NO CHANGE <br />IN THE PERMIT TEXT IS REQUIRED BY THIS COMMENT. <br /> <br />D. Appendix 4.6-B is incomplete as submitted. The reverse sides of <br />pages which were not revised from the original permit Appendix <br />4.6-B were not photocopied and included in the permit renewal <br />submittal. These pages should be provided if a complete insertion <br />is requested as stated in the transmittal cover letter. In <br />addition, appropriate sections which describe the series <br />connections of the outflows of Ponds 2B-7B as inflows to Pond 1 <br />will be required with the revised design of Pond 1. <br />P&M REGRETS THIS ERROR IN PREPARING THE RENEWAL DOCUMENT. A <br />REVISED APPENDIX 4.6-B IS ENCLOSED WITH ALL OF THE INFORMATION <br />INCLUDED. THIS APPENDIX MAY BE SUBSTITUTED DIRECTLY INTO THE <br />PERMIT IN PLACE OF THE ENTIRE APPENDIX 4.6-B. <br />E. Additional information on the design of the outlet of Diversion <br />Ditch No. 1 should be provided in the application. It is unclear <br />from the narrative description and Map 4.6-1 how the discharge from <br />the ditch will be directed past Pond 8 to Trout Creek. The <br />narrative states the ditch will outlet to a natural draw and that <br />riprap will be used if erosion occurs. In order to meet the <br />requirements of Stipulation 4b, a description of channel location <br />in the area of Pond 8 and riprap placement should be provided in <br />I the application. <br />IT WAS MUTUALLY AGREED BY MLRD AND P&M TO DEFER RESPONSE TO THIS <br />COMMENT UNTIL THE MOFFAT STABILITY STUDY IS COMPLETED. NO CHANGE <br />IN THE PERMIT TEXT IS REQUIRED BY THIS COMMENT. <br />F. The inflow collection ditch for Pond 1 should be shown on E;:hibit <br />4.5-1 and 4.6-2. The topographic drainage for the draw receiving <br />flow from Diversion Ditch No. 1 should be accurately represented on <br />these exhibits as well. Exhibits 4.6-3 and 4.6-4 should be revised <br />as described elsewhere and submitted with the application. <br />IT WAS MUTUALLY AGREED BY MLRD AND P&M TO DEFER RESPONSE TO THIS <br />COMMENT UNTIL THE MOFFAT STABILITY STUDY IS COMPLETED. NO CHANGE <br />IN THE PERMIT TEXT IS REQUIRED BY THIS COMMENT. <br />• <br />G. A plan for the permanent diversion draining into the Center Ridge <br />Pond has not been submitted as required by Rule 4.05.3. A <br />description of the design, construction and maintenance <br />requirements consistent with 4.05.3(3) and (6) should be submitted <br />with the permit renewal application for approval by the Division. <br />IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THE DIVERSION DITCH IN QUESTION HAS ALREADY <br />BEEN CONSTRUCTED A5 APPROVED IN THE ORIGINAL PERMIT APPLICATION. <br />THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON PAGE 4.6-136 PROVIDES THE DESIGN AND <br />CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DIVERSION DITCH. A REVISED <br />