My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE110759
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
200000
>
PERMFILE110759
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:07:29 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 8:00:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2001001
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
5/8/2001
Doc Name
RATIONALE FOR APPROVAL RECOMMENDATION REGULAR 112 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS APPLICATION FOUR STATES A
Section_Exhibit Name
EXHIBIT B #3 05/23/01
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
P.;,tionale for Approval Recorr ndation • May 8, 2001 <br />Four States Aggregates, LLC• <br />Line Camo Pit, File No. M•2001-001 <br />DMG review of the application identified no adequacy issues for Exhibit L, Reclamation <br />Cost. Sufficient data was submitted to satisfy the requirements of Rule 6.4.12. DMG <br />utilized the submitted information to estimate the cost of reclamation for the first year of <br />operations at 591,917. <br />26. Comments relating to close proximity to other gravel mining operations. <br />The Act and Rules do not specifically address concentration of mining operations. The <br />Act and Rules anticipate that public and private lands will be affected where mineable <br />resources exist. However, the Act and rules provide reclamation requirements to ensure <br />that affected lands are reclaimed to a beneficial land use. <br />27. Comments relating to cumulative impacts from multiple operations. <br />The Act and Rules do not specifically address cumulative impacts from multiple <br />operations. Each application is reviewed individually and approved or denied based upon <br />its compliance with the minimum requirements of the Act and Rules. <br />28. Comments relating to qua/ity of life issues. <br />The Act and Rules do not specifically address quality of life issues. <br />29. Comments relating to noise poi/ution issues. <br />The Act and Rules do not specifically address noise pollution issues. <br />30. Comments relating to dust and air pollution. <br />The Act and Rules do not specifically address air pollution issues. Please direct such <br />comments to the Air Pollution Control Division with the Colorado Department of Public <br />Health and Environment. <br />The Act and Rules authorize DMG to address stabilization of reclaimed areas for wind <br />erosion. However, DMG does not enforce the air quality standards for the dust resulting <br />from wind erosion. <br />31. Comments relating to property value issues. <br />The Act and Rules do not specifically address property value issues. <br />32. Comments relating to apparent absence of public support. <br />DMG cannot deny an application which satisfies the minimum requirements of the Act <br />and Rules. <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.