My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE110569
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
200000
>
PERMFILE110569
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:07:20 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 7:51:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988044
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
7/13/1988
Doc Name
ADEQUACY REVIEW COAL CREEK RESOURCES FN M-88-044
From
MLRD
To
TUTTLE APPLEGATE RINDAHL INC
Section_Exhibit Name
EXHIBIT C-D
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Coal Creek - 2 - July 13, 1988 <br />3. The plan states that 6 inches of topsoil will be salvaged from the upland <br />area. All topsoil encountered in the area should be salvaged. As no <br />stockpile locations are noted on Exhibit C, a report should be submitted <br />with the annual report which indicates the stockpile location and <br />measured volume of topsoil salvaged and respread in Section 11. <br />4. The plan states that topsoil in the lowland area will be stockpiled out <br />of the mining area in the creek bottom. No locations are indicated on <br />Exhibit C. What measures will be taken to protect these stockpiles from <br />potential removal by flood flows? <br />5. INining is proposed to occur directly within the channel of Coal Creek and <br />in adjacent floodplain areas. The proposed depth of mining is to remove <br />'the channel alluvial deposit down to bedrock, which varies between 10 and <br />~5 feet. Fine-grained reject material from processing would be returned <br />to the channel in a layer about 3 feet thick. <br />'ihe lateral boundaries of mining have been chosen based on restrictions <br />Niue to property boundary conditions and, where they exist, cottonwood <br />stands. The alluvium beneath these tree groups would be left in place as <br />peninsulas connected to adjacent hillslopes. <br />~4ining of the channel alluvium will affect the streamflow regime, ground <br />water levels and sediment transport. Each of these three components need <br />.:o be considered when evaluating impacts to the hydrologic balance. <br />streamflow volume and rates during flood events will generally not be <br />affected by the mining as proposed. streamflow volume and rates will be <br />significantly reduced during baseflow conditions because of lost storage <br />capacity and gradual release from removing the alluvium mined. No <br />quantitative estimates are provided on the amount of storativity lost, or <br />Flow this change in ground water level translates into stream flow <br />depletions on a monthly or annual basis. <br />Sediment transport will be affected by changes in channel slope, sediment <br />supply from the area mined, location of the channel within the floodplain, <br />a.nd channel control structures. <br />The average longitudinal slope before and after mining will not change. <br />However, local changes rn slope at points along the profile will change <br />significantly. An increased slope will occur at the upstream end of <br />mining. Increased erosion or channel scour will occur here. A 1000 foot <br />segment is proposed at the downstream end of mining as a transition zone <br />between the pit and the natural channel at Quincy Avenue Bridge. This <br />area will have a positive slope to drain but will be at a lower slope <br />than pre~nining baselevel. Aggradation is expected to occur here and <br />immediately upstream. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.