Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Coal Creek - 2 - July 13, 1988 <br />3. The plan states that 6 inches of topsoil will be salvaged from the upland <br />area. All topsoil encountered in the area should be salvaged. As no <br />stockpile locations are noted on Exhibit C, a report should be submitted <br />with the annual report which indicates the stockpile location and <br />measured volume of topsoil salvaged and respread in Section 11. <br />4. The plan states that topsoil in the lowland area will be stockpiled out <br />of the mining area in the creek bottom. No locations are indicated on <br />Exhibit C. What measures will be taken to protect these stockpiles from <br />potential removal by flood flows? <br />5. INining is proposed to occur directly within the channel of Coal Creek and <br />in adjacent floodplain areas. The proposed depth of mining is to remove <br />'the channel alluvial deposit down to bedrock, which varies between 10 and <br />~5 feet. Fine-grained reject material from processing would be returned <br />to the channel in a layer about 3 feet thick. <br />'ihe lateral boundaries of mining have been chosen based on restrictions <br />Niue to property boundary conditions and, where they exist, cottonwood <br />stands. The alluvium beneath these tree groups would be left in place as <br />peninsulas connected to adjacent hillslopes. <br />~4ining of the channel alluvium will affect the streamflow regime, ground <br />water levels and sediment transport. Each of these three components need <br />.:o be considered when evaluating impacts to the hydrologic balance. <br />streamflow volume and rates during flood events will generally not be <br />affected by the mining as proposed. streamflow volume and rates will be <br />significantly reduced during baseflow conditions because of lost storage <br />capacity and gradual release from removing the alluvium mined. No <br />quantitative estimates are provided on the amount of storativity lost, or <br />Flow this change in ground water level translates into stream flow <br />depletions on a monthly or annual basis. <br />Sediment transport will be affected by changes in channel slope, sediment <br />supply from the area mined, location of the channel within the floodplain, <br />a.nd channel control structures. <br />The average longitudinal slope before and after mining will not change. <br />However, local changes rn slope at points along the profile will change <br />significantly. An increased slope will occur at the upstream end of <br />mining. Increased erosion or channel scour will occur here. A 1000 foot <br />segment is proposed at the downstream end of mining as a transition zone <br />between the pit and the natural channel at Quincy Avenue Bridge. This <br />area will have a positive slope to drain but will be at a lower slope <br />than pre~nining baselevel. Aggradation is expected to occur here and <br />immediately upstream. <br />