Laserfiche WebLink
<br />sometimes almost impenetrable. Understory growth is composed of dense grass, sometimes sedges and <br />rushes, and various fortis. The willow tends to occupy the wettest areas with the Tamarix occupying the <br />slightly more elevated areas. However, there can also exist a broad zone where willow and Tamarix blend <br />and compete with each other. <br />This blending has been a problem in establishing wetlands at the Great Blue Heron Pit. The <br />Tamarix tends to occupy a slightly higher elevation than the willow, but not enough to avoid significant <br />competition. At that site, the Tamarix is physically removed before it becomes too large. <br />This unit is unquestionably wetland and virtually all jurisdictional wetland. It is not expected that <br />any of this unit will be affected by this operation. <br />Cattail Marsh: This unit occurs in shallow basins east of the eastern section as well as isolated <br />locations near the mouth of Brush Hollow Creek. These shallow basins, some of which might be very old <br />man made basins, are sufficiently deep that groundwater rises above the surface during the peak of the <br />runoff. During the rest of the year, the groundwater is probably not exposed, but remains very near the <br />surface. These units are clearly jurisdictional wetlands. None of these are expected to be affected by the <br />operation. <br />Grass/Scouring Rusl1: This small but interesting unit occurs in only one location on the west side <br />of Brush Hollow Creek and along the edge of the irrigated pasture and cropland. It appears to occupy a <br />slightly lower depression in an upland area and is maintained totally by tailwater from the fields. The land <br />itself is several feet above any drainageways and probably has a water table that is four to six feet below the <br />surface. <br />The scouring rush can be locally dense, but generally is widely distributed but not quite dominant. <br />This plant is probably Eguisetrern Iryemale as indicated by the growth form and the dark banding on the <br />sheaths (this is called Hippocbaete Iryernalis ssp affir:is in Weber's Colorado Flora). It is possible this plant is <br />one of the other closely related species, as species of this genus are often difficult to identify wi[hout <br />observing them throughout the season. However, all species that are possible are shown as FACW species <br />in the 1988 list of plants that occur in wetlands. <br />Because this unit is adjacent to an area that will be mined, it will be necessary to determine <br />whether it is a jurisdictional wetland or not. At this point in time, it appears not to be jurisdictional due to <br />the apparent high dependency on tailwater and its elevated location with respect to groundwater support. <br />Wetlands: Exhibit C-5 shows the locations of all wetland and potential wetland areas. These are <br />mapped in accordance with accepted wetland mapping techniques utilizing the same basis as the National <br />Wetland Inventory maps with the additional benefit of ground examination rather than almost total <br />reliance on aerial mapping. Those wetland units that are clearly or likely to be jurisdictional are cross- <br />hatched. <br />In general, the operation will not affect much of any of the wetland units identified on the Exhibit <br />C-5 map. However, some may be affected to a small extent. Where ever that occurs, delineation will be <br />needed and proper permitting obtained prior to disturbance. At this point in time, it does not appear that <br />the amount of wetland or waters of the United States that will be affected will exceed that allowed under <br />the new Nationwide Permit requirements. However, it is possible that an individual permit will be <br />required if there is more jurisdictional wetland to be disturbed than is currently anticipated. (Please see <br />Mining Plan - Exhibit D for more information.) <br />Grisenti Farms Gravel Pit Original Application Exhibit J Page J-4 <br />