My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE109820
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
100000
>
PERMFILE109820
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:06:49 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 6:56:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980001
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
MOFFAT PERMANENT IMPOUNDMENT
Section_Exhibit Name
4.6 APPENDIX 4.6-R
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• indicated acceptable water quality levels for pH, total suspended solids, <br />total dissolved solids, setteable solids, oil and grease, and total iron <br />(copies of these reports are on file at the mine site and the CDMG offices). <br />Therefore, it is expected that this impoundment will continue to adequate <br />water quality for the posCmining land use and not result in any diminution of <br />water quality for downstream users. <br />The ratio of watershed area (in acres) to impoundment permanent pool volume <br />(in acre-feet) is approximately 49.5:1. A 60:1 ratio is generally recommended <br />by the Soil Conservation Service for northwest Colorado (Figure 10, SCS <br />Agricultural handbook number 590). Although the actual ratio is slightly less <br />than that recommended, the ratio of watershed to impoundment should be <br />adequate and suitable for the intended purpose. <br />This impoundment will not result in diminution of quality or quantity of water <br />uses downstream since the impoundment is currently at its permanent pool <br />elevation. Even if the water level in the impoundment needs to be pumped down <br />sometime in the future to facilitate maintenance, there should be very little <br />lag time associated with the water level in the impoundment reaching the <br /> permanent pool elevation. This permanent impoundment will have a positive <br /> effect on down stream users in that peak flood flows will be retarded and <br />• released downst ream at a slow and steady rate. <br /> The impoundment has adequate and safe acc ess for the proposed water users <br /> (livestock and wildlife). <br />The Soil Conservation Service generally recommends that a seven foot minimum <br />depth of water be maintained in ponds in most subhumid areas (Figure 11, SCS <br />Agricultural Handbook #590). Consequently when sediment control is no longer <br />needed, the mine will ensure that the permanent impoundment has at least seven <br />feet of depth. <br /> <br />Technical Revision 32 4.6R-4 September 5, 1995 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.