My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE108925
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
100000
>
PERMFILE108925
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:01:24 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 5:31:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
7/30/2007
Doc Name
Vegetation Baseline Studies Nucla Mine 1979
Section_Exhibit Name
Section 2.05.6(2) Attachment 2.05.6(2)-1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-20- Revised OCT 3 0 !S8i <br />endangered plant species of Colorado. None of these plant species proposed <br />for threatena33 and endangered status was encountered on the study area. <br />A "vulnerable" plant species list for Colorado was obtained frcxn the <br />Plant Information Netcnrk (PIN), Colorado State University (CSU), Ft. Collins, <br />Nlorado. Plants liste3 as vulnerable are species that local ta~wrrnd,sts <br />think should be monitored for possible decrease in range or number. None <br />of the 33 "vulnerable" plant species of ~lorado was enornmtered on the <br />study area. <br />T~ DE27SI7Y AND HASAL AREA <br />' Tree density and basal area estimates are provided for species within the" <br />juniper and riparian cam¢mrities on the study area in Table 9. Density <br />figures are to be interpreted as number of trees per unit area of ttre <br />vegetation type (i.e., riparian) rnther than over all types. 7i~ juniper <br />ccmmmity, comprised of Utah jwuper (JUniperus osteospernia) contains more <br />gees per acre than the riparian type. the riparian tree oammmity, Ixxever, <br />is more diverse mntainirrg three species of trees, narrowleaf cottDlII Wd <br />( lus angustifolia), plains cottarn~ood (~. sarger!tii) aid Chinese <br />elm (Ulnas parvifolial. 'L4ie species containing the largest trees as~deter- <br />mined by basal area is the plains cottorrcvod (basal azea = 900.51 onz)~follow~l <br />by Utah juniper 1737.10 cmz), nazmwleaf cottotn cod (290.77 amz) and CJtinese <br />elm (214.26 cant) . <br />CpJER, FREQUENCY, PRODUCfIVI7Y, SHRUB DF.9SITY AND HIICSIT <br />Cover data are presented by species, life form aryl quadrat for grassland <br />and upland sagebrush vegetation types on affected and control areas in <br />Appendix B, Part 1. Basal cover is presented for all species while ~pP1' <br />cover is also determined for shrub species. Percent Dover estimates for <br />. bare grand and litter-rock deriver] frvn basal cover estimates (i.e., <br />percent grourrl rover remainirw after total vegetation cover is determined <br />is appropriated to bare grand and/or littermck). Shnrb height data are <br />~~ presented for all shrubs enco!mtered in corer quadzats. Density estimates <br />are derives] from shrub data collected in shrub density transacts. A cover, <br />shrub height and shrub density summary table for all quadrats or transacts <br />• (Revised March 2006) Attachment2.05.6(2r1-25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.