My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE108677
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
100000
>
PERMFILE108677
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:01:10 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 5:09:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981025
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
pages 4-68a -4-144
Section_Exhibit Name
4.0 Continued
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PROJECTED TNONPSON CREEK N0. 1 MINE FILLING TIMETABLE <br />Table 4.6.1-2 was prepared to predict mine inflows at the Thompson <br />Creek No. 1 Mine. These predictions were made to analyze the timetable <br />for filling the mine, the maximum head on seals, and the water augmen- <br />tation needs in the future. <br />The June 1985 mine inflows study was the basis for this projection. <br />These flows were grouped in areas with an average elevation of inflow <br />assigned to each group. The June inflows were assumed to be average <br />for the year. Accounting for seasonal variation would require very <br />complicated calculations associated with head and viscosity. Mine <br />inflows are assumed constant until the water level rises above their <br />average elevation. <br />The flows, when the water level rises above the point of inflow, <br />were calculated using Darcy's equation for seepage through a sand <br />filter *(Practical Hydraulics, Andrew L. Simon, Wiley, 1981, Page <br />130). The coefficient of permeability, the flow surface area and <br />the flow length all remain constant for an individual flow; therefore, <br />the flow is directly proportional to the head. The following assump- <br />tions were made to determine the head on each flow group. <br />`1. Inflows north of the shear zone originate where North <br />Thompson Creek crosses the outcrop of the A-Seam. <br />2. Inflows near the shear zone originate where the projected <br />shear zone crosses Middle Thompson Creek. <br />• 3. Inflows near the south end of the longwall panel originate <br />where Middle Thompson Creek crosses the outcrop of the <br />A-Seam. <br />These assumptions are believed to be very conservative in that many <br />of the flows may not be directly connected to the North or Middle <br />Thompson Creeks. The flows from the B-seam were assumed to be from <br />surface water flowing into the outcrop. The 7.5 gpm shown in June <br />1985 was from a source above the creeks, therefore, it was assumed <br />to be constant. The large spring inflows in the B-seam were assumed <br />to be eliminated by covering old portals along the outcrop of the <br />B-seam in the fall of 1986. As the mine filled above the source <br />for inflows from the North Thompson Creek and the shear zone, the <br />flows were calculated to be negative due to the negative head. These <br />negative flows are considered to be conservative on the low side <br />since there is potential for seepage along the coal seam outcrop <br />above North Thompson Creek. <br />The water capacity of the mine was calculated from the extent of <br />workings. Figure 4.6.1-3 was prepared to show filling levels. The <br />first two fill zones were calculated with respect to observed fill <br />levels. From the last fill level observed 7425', 25' intervals were <br />used to calculate volumes. In the longwall panel an effort was made <br />to account for caving. Therefore, the lower end of the longwall panel <br />C <br />4-115a (New 3/25/87) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.