My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE108142
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
100000
>
PERMFILE108142
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:00:36 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 4:19:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
6/6/2003
Doc Name
pages 2.05-84 to 2.05-166
Section_Exhibit Name
2.05 Operation & Reclamation Part 2
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
West EIk Mine <br />Block Glide Potential Due to Mining in the B-Seam in the Oliver No. 2 Mine Area <br />Block glide due to MCC mining of the B-Seam will not occur in bedrock beneath the coal zone <br />mined at the Oliver No. 2 Mine. This is based on two factors: (1) these rocks occur beneath the <br />North Fork valley and are, therefore, laterally constrained; and (2) the B-Seam in this area has a <br />dip angle of 2.6 percent which is less than that of the E/D0. <br />Effects of Rugged Topography on Subsidence and Mine Stresses <br />The subsidence factor reportedly can vary significantly in draws and on ridges in rugged <br />topography. Gentry and Abel (1978, p. 203-204) report that vertical displacement was 25 to 30 <br />percent greater on a ridge than it was in an adjacent draw in the York Canyon (Raton, New <br />Mexico) longwall mining area. Based on this information, the subsidence factor is projected to be <br />closer to 0.6 in deep draws and closer to 0.8 on isolatai ridges in the Box Canyon mining area. <br />No significant similar influence is expected in the Apache Rocks mining area because there are <br />few, if any, isolated ridges. <br />Based on observations by Mr. Dunrud in the Somerset Mine in the mid-1970s, stresses tended to <br />be significantly higher beneath isolated ridges than they were beneath more uniform overburden <br />of similar thickness. For a similar mine geometry, roof falls, bumps (rock bursts), and floor <br />heaving were noticeably greater beneath the ridges than they were beneath more uniform <br />overburden of similar thickness, because there is little or no lateral constraint to distribute the <br />weight of the isolated load of the ridge. <br />The rugged topography on the north, west, and south flanks of West Flatiron tray cause stresses <br />to be concetttrated beneath isolated ridges. Overburden thiclmess will increase by 500 to 1,000 <br />feet in horizontal distances of 1,500 feet similaz to the isolated ridge north of the first east- <br />trending side canyon of Sylvester Gulch. <br />Fracture-Controlled Drainages <br />Based on mapping by Mr. Dunrud in the Somerset azea and on recent field work, Mr. Dunrud <br />believes that there is reasonably good, but certainly not conclusive, evidence that the drainages <br />(Sylvester Gulch, an unnamed drainage west of Box Canyon, and Box Canyon) in the Box <br />Canyon permit revision area aze controlled by north-trending fractures and/or joints. These <br />fractures have been caused in part by stresses generated by the West Elk Mountain intrusive <br />bodies - particuiazly Mt. Gunnison. Section 2.04.6 (Geology Description) irtcludes additional <br />discussion and references relating to the nature and continuity of fractures. <br />The conservative approach tray be to assume that the drainage system is fracture controlled. But <br />even if fractures control the present drainage system, they may not extend downward as <br />continuous joints of fractures to the B-Seam located several hundreds of feet below. Even if the <br />fractures were present in the more brittle sandstone units, it would be very unlikely that these <br />fractures would occur in the softer siltstone and shale units. Even under the conservative <br />approach that the drainages in the Box Canyon permit revision area aze fracture controlled, it is <br />2.05-126 RevisedJurt. 1495 PRQ6; l/96 RN03; AevisedJan. 1998 PR08 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.