Laserfiche WebLink
West Etk Mrne <br />Oliver No. 2 Mine Considerations <br />Block Glide <br />This type of movement occurs where the sheaz strength, or frictional resistance, along a plane or <br />planes of weakness (commonly bedding planes) is less than the shear stress generated by the block <br />mass above them. The material above the plane of weakness then slides as a block (block glide; <br />decollement-type movement). <br />Block Glide Potential in the Oliver No. 2 Mine Area <br />~~ <br />The Oliver No. 2 Mine was an E!D-Seam coal mine operated east of Sylvester Gulch during the <br />1940s and early 1950s (See Map 5). Based on information contained in the Oliver No. 2 Mine <br />closure report dated October 1953, water-and methane-filled fractures within the mine E/I)0- <br />Seam were encountered in the floor of the Oliver No. 2 Mine. (Both water and methane were <br />reportedly under high pressure). The fractures (with a reported trend N77°E) were encountered <br />during pillar development before any fractures produced by floor-heave would likely have <br />occurred. For block glide to occur, the shear strength must be less than the shear stress generated <br />by overburden load and atry unbalanced lateral stresses. At the very gentle dip of 2.2 to 3.2 <br />degrees, a high pore-fluid pressure would be necessary to cause the shear strength to be Tess than <br />the shear stress. <br />It is very unlikely that sheaz strength along bedding planes in the coal seam (or seams) mined at <br />Oliver No. 2 could be reduced to this extent because: <br />There is no high pre-fluid pressure; the water can drain out the Oliver No. 2 Mine portals <br />even though seals of cinder blocks, arranged in double rows, were constructed 700 to 800 <br />feet south of the portal azea. This is evidenced by the lack of spring development in the <br />overburden. <br />2. The dip of bedding is 2 to 3 degrees-much less than the 8 to 17 degree angle of friction <br />for any clays that might be present in the coal-bearing rocks of the Mesaverde Formation. <br />No indication of block glide has been observed in the 42 years since the mine was closed. <br />All of the Oliver No. 2 Mine workings are outside the angle of draw of planned B-Seam <br />mining, with the exception of the first Box Canyon ganef. <br /> <br />5. State Geologists from most coal-producing states were contacted regarding the known <br />occurrence of any block glide in such gently-dipping rocks as in the Oliver No. 2 Mine <br />area. Not one could recall an occurrence of block glide, including those from eastern <br />states where coal seams typically overly a soft underclay making block glide more likely <br />(John Rold, Written Communication, November 15, 1996). <br />2.05-125 <br />RevisedJw. 1995PR06; 1/96 RNO3; RevisedJm,. 1998 PR08 <br />