My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE107942
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
100000
>
PERMFILE107942
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:00:24 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 4:01:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981016
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
mine plan for longwall
Section_Exhibit Name
APPENDIX X Section X.16 & X.17
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 2 <br />• The location of these <br />not likely. The slop <br />life of the mine. In <br />east are projected to <br />connecting these rd~k <br />slopes is also at a location where subsidence is <br />.s should be preserved at this location for the <br />the event that the main haulage entries to the <br />the surface, [here will not be a problem in <br />slopes fot a change of haulage to the surface. <br />The longwall mine projection for developing the mine to the current <br />lease boundary and thence retreat by longwall methods is a very suitable <br />method of recovery. One consideration no[ shown on the map is a 300-foot <br />barrier pillar that should be left on each side of the fain Naul~ge <br />Entry. The company is aware of this charge. This is shown on the <br />enclosed sketch or xerox copy of this section of interest. .The reason <br />foz leaving the 300-foot barrier is to allow access to the deeper coal. <br />Should bad mining conditions occur to prevent access to the deeper coal, <br />the barrier request covld.[hen be made to mine this coal. Access to <br />the deeper coal is necessary. <br />The only difference in the approved plan of 1/16/78 is the method of <br />mining. The plan approved 1/16/79 vas for continuous miner operations <br />with short panel entries. There is one set of bleeder entries designated <br />as the Dip Section that is on the new plan. The location of Chese <br />bleeder entries will have [o be moved westward to within 300 fee[ and <br />parallel to the `fain Dip Entries. A detailed plan for recovery of panel <br />entries off 2 Dip is not shown on the plan map. All that is shown on <br />• the map is the projection of where the panel entries will be located. <br />~ A revised map should be submitted to show more detail for the panel <br />development off the 2 Dip. <br />This particular mine is a very difficult mine to gain the naxinum <br />recovery of coal because of the existing soft botton that Ss prevelent <br />throughout the mine. One other characteristic within this mine is Chat <br />when mining proceeds beyond the 1500-foot of overburden, mining becomes <br />most difficult any: dangerous. Projections off the ~1ain Slope toward the <br />west for panel development for the years 1980-81 will extend beyond the <br />2000-foot cover line which will make the mining more difficult. It is <br />believed that this particular mining operation of longwall development <br />system will allow for the maximum coal recovery. <br />It is suggested that you contact Western Slope Carbon, Inc., and request <br />an updated mine m:ip to show mete details of recovery of coal within the <br />panel entries off 2 Dip and also to shoe t1~e 30)-foot barrier parallel <br />to the ALZin Slops. <br />Mining by longwal; methods will alloy for uniforn subsidence with resulting <br />minor surface impact. _.~~ <br />• <br />c, ,- <br />~ ,~ :y\ <br />! ~'r. F~ <br />1 <br />~ <br />., ` ` S <br />' t <br />' <br />~J? ~ <br /> <br />. / <br />~ <br />..~:~ i <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.