My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE106953
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
100000
>
PERMFILE106953
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:59:32 PM
Creation date
11/24/2007 2:28:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 69 Section C I. Construction Approach & Construction Monitoring Program
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Application of external forces to increase the resistant of the slope to movements will increase the <br />stability of the slope. Such resisting forces aze most often applied to the toe of the moving mass by <br />a variety of methods, including: <br />• Buttresses and tce berms <br />• Structural retention systems such as cantilever and gravity retaining walls, externally braced <br />walls supported by anchors or tie backs, soil nailing, micropiles, or conventional piles, and; <br />• A variety of reinforced-soil systems <br />The principal behind the use of buttress and tce berms is to provide sufficient dead weight or <br />resistance near the tce of the unstable mass to prevent slope movement. Buttresses and tce berms <br />that would be considered in Sylvester Gulch would consist of material developed from cuts in the <br />sandstone on the project and from oversized boulders and wbbles encountered in the constmction <br />excavations. <br />Structural retention systems such as crib walls, gabion walls, and various soil reinforcement <br />systems may be considered as mitigation measures, The tce of the mapped landslide in stability <br />section D-D' is buttressed with a reinforced soil system (MSE wall). One of the more effective <br />measures for stabilizing slope failures is the use of anchor systems such as tieback walls to <br />increase the resisting forces by applying restraint to a moving mass. <br />Techniques that are used to increase the internal strength of unstable masses include subsurface <br />drainage, soil reinforcement, and miscellaneous techniques such as chemical, electrical, and <br />thermal stabilization. <br />• In-situ reinforcement systems include soil nailing and micropiles. Soil nails are steel bars, rods, or <br />cables that are drilled and grouted into natural soil and soft rock slopes. Together with the in-situ <br />soil, the nails form coherent reinforced-soil structures capable of stopping the movement of <br />unstable slopes. Nailing differs from tieback support systems because the nails are passive <br />elements that are not post-tensioned; also, the nails are usually more closely spaced than tiebacks. <br />Stability of the surface between the nails is provided by a thin layer of shotcrete reinforced with <br />wire mesh and by intermittent large steel washers or panels. Soil nailing is most effective in dense <br />granular and low-plasticity stiff silty clay soils because a top down sequential construction <br />procedure is commonly used. This top down constmction method is particularly well suited with <br />the construction sequence for the cuts along the Sylvester Gulch. Reticulated micropiles aze cast- <br />in-place reinforced concrete piles with diameters ranging from 3 inches to 12 inches. The <br />insertions aze provided with a central reinforcing rod or steel pipe for the smaller diameters, <br />whereas those of lazger diameters may be provided with areinforcing-bar cage bound with spiral <br />reinforcement. A micropile systems forms a monolithic block of reinforced soil that extends below <br />the critical failure surface. In contrast to soil nailing, the reinforcement provided by the micropiles <br />is strongly influenced by their three dimensional geometric arrangement. <br />General Construction Approach and Schedule for the SGFA <br />As described in Exhibit 69, Sylvester Gulch Facilities Project Description, the general scope of <br />construction activities includes a network of access and light use roads, installation of a new <br />electrical substation and power distribution system, and development of a site on which two large <br />diameter mine ventilation shafts will be constructed. High priority construction tasks include: <br />• 1) Roadwork and site development for the electric power transmission and distribution lines, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.