PERMFILE106575

• Permit No: M1992066
• IBM Index Class Name: Permit File
• Doc Date: 1/21/1993
• Doc Name: ADEQUACY REVIEW HOGUE RIVER PIT FN M-92-066
• From: DMG
• To: DUCKELS CONSTRUCTION INC
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY
Department of Natural Resources
1313 Sherman Bt., Room 215
Denver, CO 80203
Phone: [phone]
FAx: [phone]
January 21, 1993

~TAT~ ~F
III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII -
999
Randy Jackson
Duckels Construction, Inc.
41230 RCR.#129
Steamboat Springs, CO 80487
RE: Adequacy Review, Hogue/River Pit,
File No. M-92-066
Dear Mr. Jackson:
COLORADO
pF. Cpl
tip, {
~~G`~
~•
~ tB'!6 ~
Roy Romer
Governor
michael B. Long
Division Director
Listed below are adequacy review comments on the above-captioned permit
application. Please submit your responses to the Division by March 15, 1993
so that they may be reviewed by the permit approval date of March 23rd.
Please submit a signed agreement between the Operator and owners Mr.
Richard H. Grant and Daid J. Winograsky addressing agreed-upon
compensation should damage occur to structures located within 200 feet of
the affected area. This would include dwellings, other buildings,
fencing, and the shallow well on their property. (Section 34-32-115(4) of
the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Act). Because an access road through
the Grant/Winograsky property may be used as a route to the Delta
Electric scales, please also submit a proof of legal right to enter
through Grant/Winograsky land.
Submit also a statement from or an agreement with the Denver and Rto
Grand Western Railroad that identifies the agreed-upon setback from their
tracks and telegraph lines.
It 1s acknowledged that the Operator will observe a 100 foot buffer
between the Yampa River and the affected area, and that the mature
cottonwoods along the tier will not be disturbed. Please submit a
statement that describes the impact that will take place across the 100
foot buffer in ditching or providing for discharge from dewatering.
It is understood that the irrigation ditch to be moved from the mined
area to the northwest and west boundaries of the permit is an end-use
ditch and not a supply ditch. Therefore no agreement or easement will be
necessary from the Duquette Ditch Company.
Because excess topsoil may be marketed as mining proceeds, the Division
requests that topsoil stockpiles to be saved for reclamation be signed or
marked as such to protect them from unintentional sale.