Laserfiche WebLink
<br />COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, Water Quality Control Division <br />Rationale - Page 12. Permit No. CO-0000221. <br />VI. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF PERMIT <br />regardless of the dilution ratio. If the receiving water is classified. <br />aquatic life class 2 with all appropriate aquatic life-based numeric <br />standards and if the chronic stream flow-to-design flow ratio is less <br />than 19:1, chronic WET testing is required. If the receiving water has <br />no aquatic life classification with numeric standards, chronic <br />monitoring is not required. <br />In this case, discharge points 002, 003, 005 and 006 discharge to a <br />receiving water which is classified as aquatic life class 2 with no <br />aquatic life-based numeric standards, and so chronic WET testing is not <br />required. However, discharge points 004 and 008 discharge to a <br />receiving water which is classified as aquatic life class 1, and so <br />chronic wET testing is required. Such testing shall be semi-annually, <br />with two species for the first year, and with only the moat sensitive <br />species during years two and three. A written request from the <br />permittee, however, will be required before relief from two species <br />testing will be allowed. After the third year of monitoring, the <br />chronic testing requirement ends unless applicable regulations are <br />adopted and the permit is modified for such new requirements. The <br />permit has already been conditioned for termination of chronic <br />monitoring after 3 years, beginning in July, 1992 and lasting through <br />June, 1995. <br />The permittee should read the WET testino sections of Part I.A. and I.B. of <br />the permit carefully, and should note that the test methods for the toxici~ <br />tests are described in detail in the Division guidance document, Guideline <br />for Conductino Whole Effluent Toxicity Tests. This document should be read <br />thoroughly prior to commencing the required WF.T testing, to ensure that the <br />permittee is aware of the various test conditions that could affect the test <br />results (e.g., sample holding time). <br />Part I.B. of the permit contains a very rigorous automatic compliance <br />schedule which the permittee is required to follow, if an unacceptable level <br />of toxicity is detected in the discharge. The permit is primarily <br />conditioned so that Division notification provisions of the compliance <br />schedule are triggered from the date of receipt, at the Division, of mailed <br />documents. As every day beyond the allotted time may constitute a day of <br />violation, it may be in the best interest of the permittee to mail documents <br />certified-return receipt requested, so as to establish a record of the <br />submittal. <br />The permittee should be aware that some of the conditions outlined above may <br />be subject to change if the facility experiences a change in discharge, as~ <br />outlined in Part II.A.1 of the permit. Such changes shall be reported to <br />the Division immediately. <br />B. Monitoring and Reporting <br />1. Monitoring: Monitoring requirements have not changed from the previous <br />permit with the following exceptions: <br />- WET testing has been added for discharge points 002, 003, 004, 005, 006 <br />and 008 <br />